Prophetic Forbidding :: By Terry James

Published on: by RR10 Category:General Articles, Terry James

As I incessantly remind readers, stage-setting for prophetic fulfillment continues at a blistering pace. This includes the minutest details God’s Word provides to give believers a heads-up on where the world stands on God’s prophetic timeline.

One such detail covered here fairly recently is the matter of the powers that be commanding that we stop eating meat. Further details of the Ephesians 6:12 cabal ratcheting up this demand have emerged to the surface of the intended Great Reset dictatorship the likes of Klaus Schwab and the “powers and principalities” have planned for the rest of us.

It is all part, of course, of Schwab’s statement involving the proposed Great Reset: “You will own nothing and love it.” —Something like that…

Paul the apostle was given the prophecy to pass along. His words now intrude into the daily headlines thanks to the global cabal that intends to rule a New World Order.

Here is the prophecy I believe indicates exactly where we stand:

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer” (1 Timothy 4:1-5).

Specifically, a recent news item I believe involves this prophecy spoke to me as a profound indicator of the lateness of this hour leading to the Tribulation era. I apologize for its length, but it adequately explains elements involved in bringing us to this point in the growing demand to abstain from eating meat.

A new £38m UK-wide centre is set to research alternatives to animal proteins, particularly from plants, fungi, algae and meat grown in labs.

The National Alternative Protein Innovation Centre (“NAPIC”) has a mission to develop “acceptable and planet-friendly alternatives to animal proteins.”

Funding has come from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (“BBSRC”) and Innovate UK, as well as three universities and the James Hutton Institute.

A statement by the organisations said supplementing traditional agriculture with alternative protein sources was “critical if we are to meet increasing demands sustainably.”

Alternative proteins are derived from sources other than animals and include terrestrial and aquatic plants, insects, proteins derived via biomass or precision fermentation and cultured meat…

Animal agriculture is estimated to produce up to a fifth of planet-warming emissions, and with the global population projected to reach nearly 10 billion by 2050, the demand for protein is expected to rise significantly.

Some sources, such as the UN Environment Programme, estimate meat consumption alone could grow up to 50 percent by 2050.

We need to find more sustainable sources of protein, and thankfully, there is a huge biodiversity in non-animal sources of protein, and we’ve barely scratched the surface of this…

[In this piece, the writer introduces alternative thoughts on the “no meat” diet.]

Fake meat, synthetic meat, test tube meat, franken meat, clean meat – call it what you will – is the trend to grow meat artificially in a laboratory, and has been attracting some impressive billionaire investment backing and media interest in recent times.

What has been interesting in this era of “fake news” and fact-checking is the number of media articles about fake meat that repeat claims by its commercial proponents that real meat is bad for just about everything, while lab-grown meat is without ethical or environmental baggage – with no apparent attempt to verify those claims.

Beyond the perception that lab-grown meat must be “better for the environment,” another fundamental premise put forward by its animal rights supporters is that it conveniently does away with the need for an animal to die in order to produce a meal.

Unlike traditional beef production, culturing animal cells in a petri dish causes no harm or pain to a sentient animal, they insist.

But what’s not yet being discussed in any of the “gee-whiz” publicity about lab-grown meat is the back story behind the medium needed to produce it.

According to a prominent Australian animal scientist spoken to by Beef Central, multiplying animal cells to create a form of meat protein in a lab requires the use of a medium based on foetal blood plasma.

Foetal blood is produced by slaughtering a pregnant cow, removing its unborn calf from its uterus, and harvesting the blood from it. While a synthetic alternative to foetal blood does exist, it is apparently prohibitively expensive to produce, the meat scientist said.

So much for “mortality-free” lab-grown meat production. (“Research Centre Launched in the UK to Push Fake Meat and Develop a National Protein Strategy,” by Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, September 3, 2024)

So it is plain that the globalists’ would-be rulers, such as those within the WEF and The Summit of the Future (scheduled to meet a few days from now to work to implement their Pact for the Future), will forbid the eating of meat.

Most of these want to reduce populations of the earth in order to make life on the planet more “sustainable,” as we’ve all heard Prince Charles (now King Charles) of Great Britain lecture about for years. In that regard, they are proposing, through the LGBTQ model and abortion/infanticide route, the reduction of marriage unions that produce children. All of this, of course, in the cause of helping with global warming/climate change—the Mother Earth worship religion they have created that Antichrist’s False Prophet will no doubt have something to say about once the Church is called into Glory by the Lord Jesus Christ.

Here, again, is how to go to Christ and avoid the coming terrors of the Tribulation.

“That if you will confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and will believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart man believes unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation” (Romans 10:9-10).

Climate Change and the Bible: Part III :: By Wilfred Hahn

Published on: by RR10 Category:General Articles, Wilfred Hahn

God Has Pitched a Tent for the Sun: Climate Change and the Bible, Part III

1“Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. In the heavens God has pitched a tent for the sun” (Psalm 19:4).

Biblical Conclusion on Climate Change

As concluded in the first two parts of this series (Part 1, Part II), the role of the sun must not be overlooked in any discussion about climate change. Does the Bible agree?

The sun is mentioned 148 times in the Bible. It is portrayed predominantly as a blessing to mankind … stable and beneficial. Apart from once “standing still” (See Joshua 10:12-14), it has steadily provided light and energy to the world. It is only in the apocalyptic and prophetic texts that the sun is shown to be harmful or catastrophic.

The obvious conclusion, therefore, is that the sun will not play any role in the destruction of the world or the judgments until the Tribulation period at the earliest. By extension, a “global climate crisis” (given its enormity as declared by the climate doomsters) cannot happen—if at all—until after the start of the Tribulation.

According to the Bible, a global climate crisis—as is imagined by the climate doomsters—cannot happen any time before. Also important to recognize is that, were such a crisis actually to occur, it would discredit the holy reputation of Jesus Christ. How so?

Listening to the alarmists, we are asked to believe that the entire planet is headed for a catastrophe … that the eradication of mankind is nigh. Given the purported earth-wide impact of global warming, why would Jesus Christ (“the Spirit of prophecy,” Revelation 19:10) not have mentioned this development in the Olivet Discourse or elsewhere in the Bible?

All other apocalyptic and existential events of global scope are prophesied in the Bible.

This writer, therefore, concludes that the Bible does not prophecy a global climate crisis occurring any time before the Tribulation, if at all. And, flatly stated, it is not occurring now.

However, the fact that there will be no crisis does not mean that there will not be any global climate changes … heat extremes, wildfires, cooling phases, floods, etc., over periods of time. There will be climate changes and related impacts, as the earth itself testifies to what has happened in the past. There is no reason to assume that climate changes will not continue to follow their natural course.

Were there to be a global climate crisis that would kill off mankind, God would have disclosed this to His prophets in advance. As the Bible says: “Surely the Sovereign LORD does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants, the prophets” (Amos 3:7). We can, therefore, know that God has not prophesied a terminal climate crisis.

Christians on Climate Change

What are the perspectives on climate change held by the Christian community today? We don’t wish to be sticklers for no apparent reason. Yet, we do note that many prophecy commentators make speculative and unfounded statements about “global climate changes.” They tend to be influenced by the histrionic statements reported in the media.

Christian responses to climate change, in this writer’s opinion, are often allegorical or non-literal. A recent article in Christianity Today agrees that there is no specific mention in the Bible about global warming. But then it states that the world will be burned up, citing 2 Peter 3:10: “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.”1

Careful readers will note that this verse would be taken far out of context if it were used to support the global warming crisis thesis today. The verse refers to the time post-Millennium when all is renewed, and the New Jerusalem descends from on high.

As such, there is no Biblical or scientific case to be made for a global warming crisis … nor as a specific end-time sign. (Note: The Roman Catholic Church is a major supporter of global responses to counteract climate change; it does not recognize literal, premillennial eschatology.)

Finally, consider the maxim, “Do no harm.” If there is no probable theory or sure solution, don’t amputate … do not spend $50 trillion … do not compromise the environment with lithium batteries … carcasses of wind turbines … and ignite massive, harmful inflation.

Here are “giveaway” signs that we often observe in matters of repressed truth and conspiracy: extreme emotionalism, hype and hysteria, corruption, fear of losing one’s job, “tar and feather” ridicule … and, above all, significant financial distortions that reveal a breakdown of productivity and wasted money.

What We Should Do Individually

Where this writer lives (the Okanagan Valley, which is shared by Washington State and British Columbia), there has definitely been an increase in forest fires and temperature highs in the summer in recent years.

This has also been paralleled by extreme cold snaps during winter, which have been disastrous for the fruit industries. This past winter, 97% of vineyards in the region perished due to extreme cold. (It is the 3rd largest vine-growing region in North America.)

Even though this writer does not believe there is an extraordinary nor manmade climate crisis underway in the world, he nonetheless does take precautions. Living in the Okanagan Valley, care should be taken to remove all combustible materials from the property … to cut down trees that are too close to residential buildings … and to ensure there is plenty of water and readied water hoses.

Such preparations are only sensible and logical. We cannot know exactly when trends will reverse or worsen over the short term. Preparedness makes sense. And, just because one may hold the position that there is no “climate crisis” does not mean that one may not support clean energy and/or environmentalism.

Thoughts to Ponder

If there is a logical answer that makes sense, why search for a more complicated one? This is the principle behind Occam’s Razor. If a hypothesis makes simple sense, why seek for a more complex theory? This applies to the “climate change” theories as well. Solar and the earth’s orbital patterns may explain and verify many facts. Then, why preoccupy oneself with more complex and unprovable theories?

“God has pitched a tent for the sun.” It continues to have an enduring role in God’s creation. “As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease” (Genesis 8:22).

There is no climate “crisis,” as the new media likes to play up in their reporting. Clearly, to say this would be an exaggeration. Moreover, there is no firm and proven science as of yet that would allow any certain solutions. As Dr. Steven E. Koonin says, the topic of global warming is “unsettled” at best. Most certainly, the claim that “science” can finely manage global temperatures is fanciful.

Why, then, is there such an adamant push to spend trillions of dollars “fighting climate change” when many of the proposed solutions cannot be proven effective in advance?

Yes, no doubt there may be many over-exuberant policymakers and scientists who are convinced of their cause. However, there are also those who push forth initiatives, fully knowing that the underlying “science” is faulty. This is dishonest.

Why? There is enormous money and influence on the line. As mentioned, “fighting climate change” involves unprecedented amounts of money … globally coordinated like never before in history.

The trillions of spending is being driven by the goals set by the United Nations (Paris Agreement) and many other agencies. Their aim is to substantially reduce global gas emissions … whether possible or not.

It may be said that the climate debates have all the hallmarks of dishonesty and ignorance. There is emotionalism, corruption, and ad hominem attacks. If a policymaker or scientist dares to make a counter-argument against the self-anointed consensus, they risk being pilloried and ridiculed … made pariahs. One-sided bias is evident seemingly everywhere (no doubt also here in this article, though not intentional).

It’s mostly about money and control. Many climate consultants are becoming enriched on bogus recommendations, and secular globalists seek control over the whole earth. God has a plan for them. “The LORD foils the plans of the nations; he thwarts the purposes of the peoples. But the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of his heart through all generations” (Psalm 33:10-11).

“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech; they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. In the heavens God has pitched a tent for the sun” (Psalm 19:1-4).

—————————————————

1 https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/what-does-the-bible-say-about-climate-change.html

Wilfred J. Hahn is a global economist/strategist. Formerly a top-ranked global analyst, research director for a major Wall Street investment bank, and head of Canada’s largest global investment operation, his writings focus on the endtime roles of money, economics and globalization. He has been quoted around the world and his writings reproduced in numerous other publications and languages. His 2002 book The Endtime Money Snare: How to live free accurately anticipated and prepared its readers for the Global Financial Crisis. A following book, Global Financial Apocalypse Prophesied: Preserving true riches in an age of deception and trouble, looks further into the prophetic future.

Do you have questions or other perspectives? You can contact Wilfred at: staff@eternalvalue.com. Please note that for reasons of volume and investment securities regulation, he cannot give financial advice.