The Six Thousandth Year From Creation :: By Randy Nettles

Chiliasm is the Greek equivalent of Millennialism. However, it has a broader meaning when used in regard to the earliest Christian eschatology. Chiliasm is not just the 1,000 years of Jesus’ millennial kingdom, but is the belief in a millennial ‘week’ of 7,000 years. Just as God created the earth in six days and rested on the seventh day, so will mankind work on the earth for 6,000 years and rest on the Sabbath ‘day,’ known as the Millennium.

This belief, by the early church fathers, was reinforced by the following scripture. “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night” (Psalm 90:4). “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (2 Peter 3:8).

Millennialism is a Christian doctrine, based on the Book of Revelation (20:1-7), that teaches Jesus Christ will establish a kingdom on earth for 1,000 years. The term comes from “millennium” (Latin mille ’one thousand’ and annum ‘year’), which means “one thousand years.” There are three different interpretations regarding the timing and nature of this 1,000-year kingdom.

Some believe that the return of Christ occurs before the millennial kingdom is established on Earth. This is known as premillennialism. Others think His return will happen after the millennial kingdom. This is known as postmillennialism.

There is a third view, called amillennialism, which interprets the millennium kingdom symbolically, and that the church is currently filling that role. The adherents to this view believe it is simply the duration of the imperfect church on Earth between Christ’s first coming and His return, and that the real kingdom of God is in heaven after the millennium on Earth is completed.

The Jews also believe in a Messianic Kingdom (although Jesus is not considered the Messiah), and it is prophesied throughout the Old Testament. This kingdom is not given a specific duration, as in the New Testament Book of Revelation, so it is considered to be eternal. One of the most famous passages of scripture regarding this kingdom is found in Isaiah 11.

“The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them. The cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice den. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea. And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for a banner of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious” (Isaiah 11:6-10).

Of course, we know Jesus is the root of Jesse (David’s father) mentioned in Isaiah 11:10. Jesus Christ will be a banner for the Jews and the Gentiles in the millennium. His millennial kingdom is considered a ‘rest’ or a ‘sabbath’ according to this verse.

There are also four major approaches to interpreting the book of Revelation and its meaning for the end time: the idealist, preterist (full and partial), historicist, and futurist views.

The idealist view teaches that Revelation describes, in symbolic or allegorical language, the battle throughout the ages between God and Satan, and between good and evil.

The preterist view teaches that the events recorded in the book of Revelation were largely fulfilled in AD 70 with the fall of the Jerusalem Temple.

The historicist view teaches that the book of Revelation is a symbolic presentation of church history from the first century AD to the end of the age. With this view, the prophecies of Revelation are fulfilled in various historic events, such as the fall of the Roman Empire, the Protestant Reformation, and the French Revolution.

The futurist view teaches that Revelation prophesies future events. These events include the rapture of the church, seven years of tribulation, and a millennial rule of Christ upon the earth.

See John’s Revelation of the Millennium: Part 1 :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready for more information on these different views and who supports them.

Before the third and fourth centuries AD, when Origen (185-254 AD) and Augustine (354-420 AD) popularized the idealist (symbolic) view of Revelation, the earlier church fathers held the historicist premillennial view. Many of the church fathers, such as Papias, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Hippolytus, and others, taught that there would be a visible kingdom of God on Earth after Christ’s return. This early view of historic premillennialism taught that the Antichrist would appear on earth and the seven-year tribulation would begin. Next would be the post-tribulation rapture, and then Jesus and His church would return to earth to rule for a thousand years.

Many Christians in the early church (mentioned below) believed that the millennium reign of Christ would involve mostly Gentile Christian believers (the Church), as the Jews had been punished by God for their unbelief through the destruction of Jerusalem and its Temple in 70 AD and their dispersion in 135 AD. The faithful would spend eternity in the New Jerusalem.

Some of the early church fathers are identified by modern scholars as ‘premillennialists’ simply because they reckoned Christ’s return to occur at the end of six thousand years, and referred to the Kingdom as the “Seventh Day.” These learned Christian men believed the return of Christ was imminent, as they thought the world was rapidly advancing towards the end of the sixth millennium (according to the LXX chronology), when Christ would literally return to set up His millennial kingdom. Below are some quotes from these early historic premillennialists regarding this subject.

Many of the earliest Christian scholars used the Septuagint version of the Old Testament (LXX) to calculate the date for creation, so they reckoned it occurred around 5500 BC. Christians up to the Middle Ages continued to use this rough estimate. The Chronicon of Eusebius (early 4th century) dated creation to 5228 BC, while Jerome dated creation to 5199 BC.

Bede (673-735 AD) was one of the first to break away from the standard Septuagint date for the creation, and his work De Temporibus (On Time), which he completed in 703 AD, dated the creation to March 18, 3952 BC, but was accused of heresy at the table of Bishop Wilfrid because his chronology was contrary to accepted calculations of approximately 5200-5500 BC. After the Masoretic Text was published, however, dating creation to around 4000 BC became common and was widely supported.

Among the Masoretic creation calculations for the date of creation, Archbishop Ussher’s chronology, dating creation to 4004 BC, became the most widely accepted and popular, mainly because this date was attached to the King James Bible. Bishop William Lloyd put Ussher’s chronology, with some of his own modifications, in the margins of a 1701 edition of the Bible.

For many years, the King James Version was printed with these dates. It was also included in the widely distributed Scofield Reference Bible. This led many to believe that Ussher’s dates were the correct Bible chronology, a position which is defended by some writers to this day, including Floyd Nolen Jones, Chronology of the Old Testament, Sacred Writ (floydnolenjonesministries.com). Personally, I believe it is off by about 36-44 years. See Ussher’s Chronology :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready

EARLY CHURCH FATHERS WHO BELIEVED IN CHILIASM

The writer of the Epistle to Barnabas wrote (circa 117/132 AD), “Attend, my children, to the meaning of this expression, ‘He finished in six days.’ This implies that the Lord will finish all things in six thousand years, for a day is with Him a thousand years. And He Himself testifies, saying, “Behold, today will be as a thousand years.” Therefore, my children, in six days, that is, in six thousand years, all things will be finished. “And He rested on the seventh day.” This means: when His Son, coming again, shall destroy the time of the wicked man, and judge the ungodly, and change the sun, and the moon, and the stars, then shall He truly rest on the seventh day.”

Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho (written circa 155 AD), wrote, “But I and others, who are right-minded Christians on all points, are assured that there will be a resurrection of the dead, and a thousand years in Jerusalem, which will then be built, adorned, and enlarged, as the prophets Ezekiel and Isaiah and others declare.” Justin did mention that, “many who belong to pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise.” Evidently there were already others who did not believe in a literal millennium at that point in history, but Justin does not supply their names. Justin became one of the first Christian apologists, explaining Christianity as a reasonable system.

Irenaeus wrote in his Against Heresies (written from 180 to 199 AD), “These [promises given by Christ] are to take place in the times of the kingdom, that is, upon the seventh day, which has been sanctified, in which God rested from all the works which He created, which is the true Sabbath of the righteous, which they shall not be engaged in any earthly occupation; but shall have a table at hand prepared for them by God, supplying them with all sorts of dishes.” Irenaeus followed Paul more closely than the apostolic fathers after him. Theologically biblical rather than philosophical, he was the first theologian who wrote for the church. He saw himself as a shepherd of God’s flock.

Tertullian wrote (207-212 AD), “But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple at Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom, that is, the rest, the hallowed seventh day; and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance, in which kingdom the Lord declared, that ‘many coming from the east and from the west should sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.” Tertullian was one of the first to articulate the doctrine of the Trinity, stating that God is one substance and yet three persons.

Hippolytus (circa 170-236 AD) of Rome, in his literary work, Commentary on Daniel, wrote, “For the first appearance of our Lord in the flesh took place in Bethlehem, under Augustus, in the year 5500; and He suffered in the thirty-third year. And 6,000 years must needs be accomplished in order that the Sabbath may come, the rest, ‘the holy day on which God rested from all His works.’ For the Sabbath is the type and emblem of the future kingdom of the saints, when they ‘shall reign with Christ,’ when He comes from heaven, as John says in his Apocalypse: for ‘a day with the Lord is as a thousand years.’ Since, then, in six days God made all things, it follows that 6,000 years must be fulfilled. And they are not yet fulfilled, as John says: ‘five are fallen; one is,’ that is, the sixth; ‘the other is not yet come.’”

Hippolytus employs the creation-week typology widely accepted in the West until Augustine. He set the time of Christ’s return in 500 AD. This would be the “sixth day” or 6000 AM (anno mundi) according to the Septuagint chronology. Hippolytus was the church’s most important theologian in the third century. (Note: the Septuagint LXX is about 1,600 years longer than Ussher’s Masoretic chronology. Usher’s chronology is about 36-44 years longer than my reckoning. See Chronology of Mankind: 6,000 Years of History Pt 1 :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready or a slightly revised version in The Hepta Week Cycle For Six Millennia of Mankind :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready.

So, the prevailing view among early (1st–3rd century AD) Christians such as Papias, Justin Martyr, and Irenaeus was that history would end with a Messianic rule centered in Jerusalem following Christ’s return (i.e., premillennialism). However, after the Roman Empire under Constantine embraced Christianity in the early 4th century, it became more common to spiritualize the concept of the millennium as the reign of Christ in the hearts of his people and the reign of the Christian dead in heaven. The millennium and church history became synonymous in this burgeoning new eschatological interpretation.

Premillennialism began to die out in the established Catholic Church during Augustine’s life (354-430 AD). Chiliasm was suppressed by the dominant Catholic Church but survived through various “fringe” groups of Christians during the medieval period. During the Protestant Reformation, Anabaptists and Huguenots helped revive premillennialism, which was later adopted by some Puritans in the Post-Reformation era.

During the Reformation era (1517-1648), reformers such as Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, Ulrich Zwingli, William Tyndale, John Calvin, Hugh Latimer, Nicolas Ridley, Thomas Cranmer, and John Knox challenged the Catholic Church in many areas while retaining their amillennial doctrine. See John’s Revelation of the Millennium: Part II :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready.

The great preachers in Europe and the colonies in America during the Great Awakening (1726-1760), such as Gilbert Tennent, Jonathan Edwards, George Whitfield, John Wesley, Charles Wesley, David Brainerd, and others, took up the eschatological mantel of amillennialism (and postmillennialism or a combination of both).

Dispensational premillennialism (sometimes called futuristic premillennialism) developed later than historical premillennialism. It was popularized by John Darby, a member of the Plymouth Brethren, in the 1830s and by Cyrus Ingerson (C.I.) Scofield, who published Darby’s ideas in the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. This eschatological view was popularized in the early 19th century… not discovered. You could say it was rediscovered, as there are several examples of dispensational writings dating back very early in the Church.

A sermon by Pseudo-Ephraem (4th-6th century titled “On the Last Times, the Antichrist, and the End of the World” states, “All the saints and elect of God are gathered together before the tribulation, which is to come, and are taken to the Lord, in order that they may not see at any time the confusion which overwhelms the world because of our sins.” Other examples include Codex Amiatinus (ca.690-716), Brother Dolcino (d. 1307), Increase Mather (1693-1723), John Gill (1697-1771), Morgan Edwards (1722-1795), and others.” 5. Survey of Eschatological Views | Bible.org

The greatest development and spread of premillennialism since the early church came in the late 1800s – early 1900s with the rise of U.S. Fundamentalism and Dispensationalism. Starting in the British Isles and spreading to America, premillennialism (in its dispensational form) has become prominent in the Evangelical faith. Dispensational Premillennialism employs a more consistently literal hermeneutic when interpreting eschatological Scriptures than other views do.

Dr. David L. Cooper describes the golden rule of interpretation: “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense; therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in the light of related passages and axiomatic and fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.”– Dr. David L. Cooper (1886-1965), founder of the Biblical Research Society.

Clearly, this golden rule has been ignored by some of the great Soteriology preachers, from the early Church to modern times. Augustine, John Calvin, Martin Luther, and O.T. Allis were all Amillennialists who allegorized Scripture “when the plain sense of Scripture made common sense.” John Owen, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Hodge, and B.B. Warfield were all Postmillennialists who also allegorized much of eschatology and prophecy. They substituted the Church for Israel regarding God’s promises to “His chosen people” when there was no Scripture to substantiate this claim. This substitution of the Church for Israel is called Replacement Theology, also called supersessionism or fulfillment theology.

I don’t understand how these great preachers of old could substitute the Church for Israel, as Israel is clearly the subject in the following scripture. They definitely weren’t following the golden rule of interpretation. “And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the Lord. As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the Lord; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith the Lord, from henceforth and for ever.

Arise, shine; for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee…. And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising…. Thy people also shall be all righteous: they shall inherit the land for ever, the branch of my planting, the work of my hands, that I may be glorified” (Isaiah 59:20-21, 60:1,3,21).

At least the theologians of the early Church, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Tertullian, believed in a literal millennial reign of Jesus Christ. They also believed humankind would exist on Earth for 6,000 years (the equivalent of six days for the Lord) before Jesus returns to establish his Kingdom for 1,000 years (the seventh day), before the new heavens and new earth are made (or transformed). However, they and modern preachers such as G.E. Ladd and Alexander Reese all believed in Historic Premillennialism, whose eschatological interpretations did not yield a reasonable exegetical reading of the Scripture involved (I.M.H.O.).

The duration of the Messiah’s kingdom on Earth was never given in any of the Old Testament prophecies. Not until Revelation 20 does John declare it will last for 1,000 years, thus the name “millennial kingdom.” Revelation 20 follows Jesus’ Second Coming as described in Revelation 19. So, the order of eschatology (study of end things) is established in the book of Revelation.

The pre-tribulation rapture is found in Revelation 4. The seven-year-long tribulation is found in Revelation 5-19. The Second Coming of Christ is described in Revelation 19. The millennial reign of Christ is found in Revelation 20, and the eternal order with a new heaven and earth is found in Revelation 21–22. The golden rule of interpretation indicates that these will all be future physical and literal events, not some kind of allegory.

Ever since Jesus’ death, resurrection, and ascension, Christians throughout the ages have been wondering when Jesus would return. The worse things got with persecutions, wars, famine, plagues, etc., the higher expectations became, as Christians in that particular age believed they were experiencing the “great tribulation” of Matthew 24:21. I would imagine this is why the Jews were so willing to accept Simon Bar Kokhba as their Messiah in 132 AD when he led a ruinous revolt against Rome from 132-135 AD. This was more than six decades after Jerusalem and the Second Temple were destroyed in 70 AD.

The early Chiliasts of the 1st – 3rd centuries held this belief, as they believed Jesus would return after 6,000 years. Hippolytus employed the creation-week typology widely accepted in the West until Augustine. He set the time of Christ’s return to 500 AD. This would be the “sixth day” or 6000 AM (anno mundi) according to the Septuagint chronology. I’m sure expectations for the return of Christ ran high after the Visigoths sacked Rome in 410 AD, especially for the remaining (but dwindling in number) Chiliasts, as they believed there were only nine decades left until the 6th day (6,000 years), Christ’s imminent return which they speculated (according to the LXX chronology) would occur in 500 AD.

The expectation of Christ’s imminent return always spikes after a major disaster. In the 8th and 9th centuries, it was the Muslim invasions. In the 12th and 13th centuries, it was the Crusaders’ wars against the Muslims. In the middle of the 14th century, it was the Black Death plague. In the middle of the 15th century, Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire fell to the Ottoman Turks. The list is exhaustive and continues into modern times, with two world wars in the 20th century and a major war between Russia and Ukraine now in the 21st century.

Of course, the number one sign of the return of Christ, especially for dispensational premillennialists, is Israel’s return as a sovereign nation (in its ancient homeland) on May 14, 1948. This should be proof to the amillennialists and postmillennialists that the Church hasn’t (and never has) replaced the nation of Israel regarding God’s promises to them. Another indication we are in the last days is given in 2 Timothy 3:1-5 (prevalent sin comparable to the days of Noah and Lot). Also, we now have the technology for the prophecies of Revelation 11:9 and 13:13-18 to be fulfilled.

However, the major sign that we are living in the end times before the Tribulation and the Second Advent is the convergence of all the signs given in Matthew 24:3-14 and the other synoptic gospels.

As a modern Chiliast (dispensational premillennialist) with a belief in the millennial week theory, I believe that Christ’s return is imminent. Unlike the 1st–3rd-century historic premillennialists, whose chronology was based on the Septuagint, I believe the correct chronology of human history is given in the Masoretic Text. In this reckoning, major biblical and faith-based events occur, or will occur, approximately every 2,000 years.  

MAJOR BIBLICAL EVENTS EVERY 2,000 YEARS – THE JUST SHALL LIVE BY FAITH

Adam was made on the sixth day of creation in approximately 3968 BC. See The Hepta Week Cycle For Six Millennia of Mankind :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready.

Abraham was born approximately 2,000 years after Adam’s creation. Abraham is not only the father of the Israelites but the father of all the faithful. “Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all” (Romans 4:16).

Author’s note: According to my chronology, based on Scripture, Abram (Abraham) was born around 2017 AM (anno mundi) or 1951 BC. Abram’s birth may not be the event that personifies the importance of the 2,000th anniversary of mankind’s existence (2000 AM or 1968 BC). After all, Abram didn’t even know of Yahweh until he was much older. He, by faith, answered God’s call and left Haran to travel to the Promised Land at age 75. Instead, the person who might mark the 2,000th year is Melchizedek, the priest of the “Most High” God and the King of Salem. He is first mentioned in Genesis 14, but was no doubt King of Salem (and priest of the Most High God) long before he met Abram. We will discuss this theory in a later article.

Jesus was crucified approximately 1,000 years after King David died (in 970 BC) and 2,000 years after Abraham’s birth. Christ was crucified, resurrected, and ascended to heaven, and the faithful Church was born approximately 4,000 years (4000 AM) into recorded history (3968 BC + 33 AD = 4,000 years). Of course, we know 4,000 years is as 4 days for the LORD.

Interestingly, God/Elohim (The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) made the sun, moon, and stars on the fourth day of creation“And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years” (Genesis 1:14). These heavenly “lights” were primarily made for man to keep up with time, by way of calendars (lunar and solar). They were also made for signs pointing to future important events. See Signs and Seasons Pointing to Jesus :: By Randy Nettles – Rapture Ready.

Isn’t it fitting that Jesus, as the second Person of the Godhead, the Word, created and set in motion the sun, moon, stars, and earth eons ago? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:1-3).

The same heavenly bodies that the pre-incarnate Jesus created would determine when He would come to the earth to accomplish His mission for the Father. “But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons” (Galatians 4:4-5).

This “fullness of time” was on the “fourth day” (4,000 years from creation, as a day for the LORD is as a thousand years). The number 4 represents Creation. In the beginning, there was the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The fourth thing was the creation of the heavens and the earth (and everything in them). It is the number of the world and material completeness.

Even during creation (and before), God, the Father, had in place His plan to redeem mankind. He would send, in the fullness of time (4000 AM), the Word to the earth to become the Son of God and the Son of man (Jesus Christ), a kinsman redeemer for His creation. “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:12-13).

Will Jesus return on the exact “sixth day” (6000 AM), or will it be “approximately” 6,000 years? Is 2033 AD the six thousandth year from creation (3967 BC years + 2033 AD years = 6000 AM)? Of course, if He were to return to establish His millennial kingdom in 2033, the pretribulation Rapture would occur seven years earlier, in 2026. Hey, that’s this year! For how the seven-year Tribulation chronology could theoretically play out (on both the Gregorian and Jewish calendars), see (100) Reckoning Daniel’s 70th Week From the Gregorian Calendar.

We know that man, who was made in the image of God, was made on the sixth day, and God gave him dominion over all of the other created beings (the animals) of the earth. 1 Corinthians 15:45 calls Jesus the “last Adam.” Just as Adam was made on the sixth day of the creation week, the “last Adam,” Jesus, will return to the earth on the “sixth day” (IMHO), where His reign and dominion will be absolute.

“He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (Luke 1:32-33).

Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Randy Nettles

rgeanie55@gmail.com

Randy Nettles articles: Article Archives – Rapture Ready

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eternal Security: Difficult Passages 2 :: By Mark A. Becker

Some Christians claim and will cite passages of Scripture they believe confirm their position that a true Spirit-indwelt believer in Jesus Christ can lose their salvation. Conversely, other Christians assert that all born-again Spirit-indwelt believers in Messiah Yeshua have Eternal Security, a doctrine that says a converted Spirit-indwelt believer who truly accepts the Lord is eternally secure in their salvation and can never fall away from the faith.

Those who have followed my writings know where I stand on this issue: Every truly born-again Spirit-indwelt believer has divine Eternal Security. The Father does not make oversights when He gifts a true believer in His Son with His indwelling Holy Spirit for life!

This study series seeks to evaluate Difficult Passages that some Christians say contradict the doctrine of Eternal Security.

When it comes to our topic, we should be cognizant of the fact that there have always been three groups of people within the professing church. These three groups are born-again Spirit- indwelt believers, Carnal Christians, and False Converts. Therefore, as we have pointed out in many other studies, the student of the Word needs to keep these three groups in mind as the Brit Chadashah (New Testament Scriptures) addresses all three groups in various passages with differing approaches and degrees that need to be discerned.

Many of these difficult passages with their proper interpretations, in most cases, are dependent upon the status of whether an individual is truly saved or not – that is, born-again Spirit-indwelt believers (including Carnal Christians) and False Converts. Based upon the status of whether an individual is truly saved or not is how these passages must be recognized, understood, interpreted, and applied. This crucial interpretive consideration will become more apparent as we move along in our study.

Previous article:

Eternal Security: Difficult Passages 1

All underlined Scripture passages are my own emphasis.

The Book of Hebrews

The book of Hebrews and the epistles of Peter and James are uniquely directed specifically towards Israelites as opposed to professing Christians in the churches – Israelites and Gentiles – that Paul, John, and Jude addressed in their letters.

These teachings tend to revolve around the concepts already established in the hearts and minds of the Israelites and how they perceived and understood the Word of God (Tanakh) that they were very familiar with, and how the chosen people of God interpreted the Judaism they practiced.

It is vitally important that the student of the Word understands that the book of Hebrews is first and foremost an outreach to all Israelites in the known world at the time the author wrote his epistle. His desire was to save as many Israelites as possible as he expounded upon Israel’s patriarchs, Israel’s historical relationship to God in the ancient past, their history as a nation and as the chosen people of God, their acceptance and rejection of God and His Word at different times throughout their history, how the Levitical Priesthood pointed to the Messiah, and many other like Israeli historical illustrations provided within the Hebrew Scriptures.

Thus, by citing and reminding the Israelites of their Hebrew Scriptures, their past national history, and their national heritage found only in God who chose them to be His special people, the author would often employ a contrast between those historical Biblical events of Israel’s past (both good and bad) with the Israelites of his day; specifically, how they should respond to the New Covenant gospel message found only in Messiah Yeshua that the author of Hebrews was proclaiming.

The foundational truth of the once-for-all sacrifice of Messiah Yeshua for the sins of the world (Hebrews 10:9-13) and His death, burial, and glorious resurrection (Hebrews 13:20-21) was what the author of Hebrews was directing them toward, while reminding them of their ancestral past with their covenantal relationship with God and how it all pertained to and pointed to Messiah and His work of salvation and redemption at His First Advent.

The temptations from the religious leaders and their own familial relationships to return to the legalism found within the Judaism practiced in their day and/or to reject or supplement the gospel message of Messiah Yeshua with their newfound freedom in Messiah would have been intense for these Hebrew professing believers whom the author of Hebrews was also addressing. This was obviously a primary concern for the author of the book of Hebrews, as it most certainly should have been. The Judaizers of the first century had an immensely negative impact on not only Hebrew converts (Acts 15:1-11) but on Gentile believers as well (Galatians).

It is equally imperative that the student of the Word of the Scriptures be cognizant of the fact that the writer of the book of Hebrews speaks to the Israelites as recognizing that some of them who would read his epistle were already saved, while others were not. Therefore, one needs to evaluate, based on context and the overall message of any given passage, the intended audience the author is intending to reach – saved, unsaved, or both.

Hence, the student must keep in mind that the author of Hebrews, at many times, is directing his teachings in a manner that tends to revolve around the concepts already established in the hearts and minds of the Israelites and how they perceived the Hebrew Scriptures and the Old Covenant they were familiar with, and how the people interpreted the Judaism they practiced, in an effort to lead them to saving faith in Messiah Yeshua, as well as edifying and encouraging those who had already professed Messiah Yeshua as their Lord and Savior.

Hebrews 2:1

“Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip.” – Hebrews 2:1

Those who cite this verse as showing a born-again Spirit-indwelt Christian can lose their salvation often fail to seek the remaining context in the following verses.

“For if the word spoken by angels was stedfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward; How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him; God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?” – Hebrews 2:2-4

The Greek for “we should let [them] slip” is παραρρυῶμεν “pararryōmen” from 3901 παραρρέω “pararreō” – used only this once in the Brit Chadashah – meaning to flow bycarelessly pass (miss), let slip. The idea behind this word’s suggested outline of Biblical usage is as follows:

  1. To glide by: lest we be carried by, pass by.
  2. Lest the salvation which these things heard show us how to obtain, slip away from us.
  3. A thing escapes me.
  4. Slips my mind.

Once again, we note that the passage could very well be dependent upon one’s standing regarding salvation. Are they truly born-again Spirit-indwelt believers or False Converts? Where they are concerning their salvation standing influences how this passage applies to them.

Consider the two groups of people and how this passage would apply to them.

  1. Born-again Spirit-indwelt believers (including and especially Carnal Christians), if they are not careful in their walk with the Lord, can “let slip” those things concerning their “great salvation” in Messiah Yeshua when they are walking in the flesh and not the Spirit (Galatians 5:16-17, Romans 7:14-25), allowing themselves to be enamored with the affairs of this world. The solution for the saved is to obviously get back in right standing with the Lord and “give the more earnest heed to the things which [they] have heard.”
  2. False Converts, on the other hand, would be those who would “let them slip” – that is, the gospel message that was preached to them – and would be those who would notheed the things which [they] have heard.” These are they who would outrightly reject and “neglect so great a salvation” which they had heard and understood.

Obviously, truly born-again Spirit-indwelt Christians could never neglect their eternal salvation (such as yielding to the leading of their flesh and/or falling into sin for a time) to the point of losing their faith in Christ, nor would they ever deny their Lord.

The Greek for “if we neglect” is ἀμελήσαντες “amelēsantes” from 272 ἀμελέω “ameleō” meaning to be careless ofto neglect, and is translated by the KJV translators as neglectmake light ofregard not, and be negligent in the five times it is used in the Brit Chadashah.

Once again, a born-again Spirit-indwelt believer may neglect or be careless, for a time, their “so great a salvation,” yet they will never depart from the faith and deny their Lord and Savior.

Conversely, a False Convert will make light of and regard not the “so great a salvation” gospel message which they have heard and understood, only to rebel and reject it.

In all, this verse does not signify that a born-again Spirit-filled Christian can lose their salvation. Yet it does reveal a practical assessment for both the truly saved (including Carnal Christians) and the unsaved (including False Converts) to honestly evaluate when considering their own standing regarding salvation.

Hebrews 3:6, 12

“But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if [when, whenever] we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.” – Hebrews 3:6

Intriguingly, the text analysis of this verse is informative, as the literal chronological rendering of this verse reads as follows:

“Christ, but as a Son as over [the] house, His own whose house are we, if [when, whenever] the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope unto the end, firm, we hold fast.” – Hebrews 3:6

Our next observation is that the following verses of Hebrews 3:6 are absolutely essential for context that leads us directly into our second verse that others will cite in their belief that someone can lose their salvation, Hebrews 3:12.

Here is the entire passage of Hebrews 3:6-12.

“But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if [when, whenever] we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.

“Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice, Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years. Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.)

Take heedbrethrenlest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbeliefin departing from the living God.” – Hebrews 3:6-12

The Author of Hebrews is speaking to Israelites, reminding them of Israel’s past, in which many of the Israelites would at first outwardly accept the laws and covenant of God (Nehemiah 9:13-18) but would inevitably rebel against them and the Lord that gave them. This was a cycle that plagued the Israelites from the time of the Judges until their dispersions.

Paralleling those Israelites who had outwardly accepted at first God and His laws with their eventual rebellion and rejection of God and His laws, would be equated with False Converts in the church age. Just like the Israelites who rebelled after their perceived acceptance of God and His Word, they, like False Converts today who also have “an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God,” were never saved to begin with.

Thus, any Hebrew (or any person) who claims to be a believer of Messiah Yeshua who has “an evil heart of unbelief” will eventually “depart from the living God” they once professed to know and believe in because of that “evil heart of unbelief.” A heart of unbelief in one’s life goes hand in glove with the same soul who departs from the faith, just as one soul who departs from the faith goes hand in glove with one’s evil heart of unbelief. They are synonymous in their working together in unity within the life of a False Convert.

As Paul points out in his epistle to the Romans, it is because of a heart of belief in the salvation that Christ has procured for them on the cross – a belief that is genuine and never wavers – that a man or woman is justified unto a life of righteousness and thankfulness for what Christ has done for them.

“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” – Romans 10:9-10

As Henry Morris states in his Study Bible concerning Hebrews 3:6: The Word of God provides adequate assurance of eternal salvation for every genuine believer, but no warrant for arrogant presumption.

Simply put, an honestly genuine belief is diametrically opposed to a superficial belief that ultimately reveals “an evil heart of unbelief,” which, as Henry Morris notes, “is also an erring heart (3:10) and a hardened heart (3:8).” One saves to a life given to righteousness, holiness, and thankfulness, while the other condemns and is revealed to others in one’s “departure from the living God” after they have heard and understood the divine gospel of salvation they received from those who testify to the grace of God through His divine Son, Messiah Yeshua.

So, who would “hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope to the end?” It would be the twice-born Spirit-indwelt believer who has come to Messiah Yeshua by grace through faith, never to have “an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God,” and is of Christ’s “own house, whose house are we.”

And who are those who would not “hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope to the end?” Those who will have rejected the gospel message as taught by the Apostles, their disciples, and others of like faith in Jesus Christ, never truly believing because of “an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God,” and can therefore never be a member of Christ’s “own house…

There is no losing of one’s salvation in Hebrews 3:6 or Hebrews 3:12.

Hebrews 4:1

“Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem [be accounted/reputed] to come short of it [come too late].” – Hebrews 4:1

Here, again, we need further context found in the following verse.

“For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.” – Hebrews 4:2

The writer of Hebrews is comparing allegorically those past Israelites (“them” who heard the good news of God’s Promised Land of rest) who, because of their unbelief, were not allowed to enter the Lord’s rest in the Promised Land (as outlined in Hebrews chapter 3) with those Israelites the writer was addressing who have heard the good news of the gospel of Messiah Yeshua.

Those who would “come short of it” or “come too late of it” – “it” being “the gospel preached” – are those who heard and understood the gospel, and it “did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.”

This warning in Hebrews 4:1-2 is to all hearers of the “gospel preached” and is entirely predicated on one’s belief or disbelief, faith or no faith, in the Word of God that is preached by men of God, just as it was with the ancient Israelites.

There is no allusion to one losing their salvation.

Hebrews 4:11

“Let us labour [give diligence] therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall [perish, come to an end, disappear, cease] after the same example of unbelief.” – Hebrews 4:11

The Greek for “Let us labor” is σπουδάσωμεν “spoudasōmen” from “labor” 4704 σπουδάζω “spoudazō” which can mean to exert one’s selfendeavor, and give diligence, which is the same word and carries with it the same connotation as that used by the Apostle Peter in a verse we have cited often in our Bible studies:

“Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence [σπουδάσατε “spoudasate”] to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall” – 2 Peter 1:10

Believers in Jesus Christ are to “give diligence to make [our] callings and elections sure,” just as we are to “give diligence… to enter into that rest” of Messiah. These two Scripture passages are essentially one and the same when it comes to the believer’s responsibility in knowing they are truly saved.

[For more on this topic, please see ‘If So Be That the Spirit of God Dwell in You’ and the linked articles therein.]

Therefore, “any man” that would “fall [perish, come to an end, disappear, cease] after the same example of unbelief” as many of the ancient Israelites did in the Exodus in their rebellions against God, would prove themselves to be an unsaved False Convert by their blatant unbelief.

“Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief…” – Hebrews 4:6

The entire theme of this chapter is the contrast between those who truly believe the gospel of Messiah Yeshua and the unbelief of others. Those Hebrews who genuinely believe in faith the good news of the gospel will enter the promised rest of the Lord, just as those Israelites who truly trusted and believed in the Word of the Lord entered the Promised Land. Those who have a heart of unbelief will not enter the Lord’s rest, just as many Israelites who lacked faith in unbelief of the Word of the Lord were not allowed to enter their rest in the Promised Land.

There is no implication of one losing their salvation in Hebrews 4:11.

Hebrews 6:4-6

“For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.” – Hebrews 6:4-6

We closed out our study on this verse in Hebrews 6:4-6 – ‘It Is Impossible!’, with the following words:

This entire hypothetical proclamation can never happen – ‘It Is Impossible!’

Our Eternal Security is sealed by the “Holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His glory” upon our individual conversions!

“In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.

“In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.” – Ephesians 1:11-14

The promises of God for the Holy Spirit-filled believer – just as one of the Names of our Savior is – is Faithful and True (Revelation 19:11)!

“Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen!” – Revelation 7:12

Please see Hebrews 6:4-6 – ‘It Is Impossible!’ for a detailed examination on this passage.

Hebrews 6:4-6, as the rest of the Scriptures we are looking at, does not teach that a born-again Spirit-indwelt believer can lose their salvation. In fact, the writer of Hebrews is stating just the opposite, as the entire premise of this passage is utterly impossible for the twice-born believer in Messiah Yeshua!

Hebrews 10:38

“Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.” – Hebrews 10:38

This is the last of three times Habakkuk 2:4 is quoted in the Brit Chadashah:

“Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.” – Habakkuk 2:4

Hebrews 10:38 is another verse that is often cited by those who say one can lose their salvation; yet, once again, the context is omitted either intentionally or ignorantly. All we need to do, to see the proper context, is read Hebrews 10:38 along with Hebrews 10:39.

Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe [have faith] to the saving of the soul.” – Hebrews 10:38-39

Henry Morris added the following in the Henry Morris Study Bible:

The emphasis throughout Hebrews 11 on “faith” is simply a recital of the outworking of the faith introduced into the discussion here in Hebrews 10:38-39 (there were no chapter divisions in the original manuscript). Thus the working faith of Hebrews 11 is the living faith of Hebrews 10:38 and the saving faith of Hebrews 10:39, and that faith must be exercised first of all on the creation work of God (Hebrews 11:3).

Those Hebrews who are born-again Spirit-indwelt believers, believing truly in the gospel of Messiah Yeshua “are not of them who draw back unto perdition,” but are “of them that believe to the saving of the soul.”

Therefore, if “any man draw back” from the gospel they have heard and understood, rejecting the testimony of the life-saving blood of Jesus Christ for their sins, not living “by faith” in Yeshua as those who have put their faith and trust in the Son of God have, then God’s “soul shall have no pleasure in him,” resulting in eternal “perdition” and separation from their Creator.

There is no notion of anyone losing their salvation in this verse.

Hebrews 12:25

“See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven…” – Hebrews 12:25

The writer of Hebrews has been making another contrast in this section between the Israelites who received God’s commandments from Moses on Mount Sinai and the Israelites of his day who are receiving the teachings of the New Covenant, relating those who will be saved by grace through faith in Messiah Yeshua as being pictured as living on Mount Zion in the heavenly Jerusalem, and the stark differences between those who reject that life-saving gospel message.

The Hebrew for “if we turn away from Him” is ἀποστρεφόμενοι “apostrephomenoi” – used only this once – from 654 ἀποστρέφω “apostrephō” which means to turn oneself away fromto rejectto refuse. These definitions would certainly be the proper understanding of the phrase in this context by the writer of Hebrews.

Therefore, the verse could be read as follows:

See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we reject/refuse him that speaketh from heaven

Some translations do render the phrase as reject Him instead of turn away from Him.

This same sense of this Greek phrase is found in Matthew, where the Lord Jesus Christ urged His disciples to have a giving heart for others:

“Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away (ἀποστραφῇς “apostraphēs” 654 ἀποστρέφω “apostrephō”).” – Matthew 5:42

The writer of Hebrews is unmistakably pleading with his Israelite audience not to reject/refuse the Lord or turn away from the Lord Jesus Christ who now speaks from heaven of the New Covenant, for if they do, they will not escape from their eternally sealed fate, just as many ancient Israelites did not escape their eternally sealed fate when they rejected/refused/turned away from God’s Old Covenant He made with Israel on Earth during Israel’s Sinai experience, as well as those Israelites “that did not believe in the Lord their God” (2 Kings 17:14).

The decision is theirs, and the writer of Hebrews is warning his brethren, the Israelites, not to neglect, refuse/reject, or turn away from the Lord and the New Covenant gospel message freely given to those who come to Him by grace through saving faith in Messiah Yeshua.

There is no reference to anyone losing their salvation in this verse; only a warning to the Israelites not to refusereject, or turn away from Messiah Yeshua’s life-saving Words, the New Covenant He provided for them with His perfectly shed blood on the cross, and His free-gift offer of salvation made to every man and woman in every age.

Conclusion

We pray this second installment of Eternal Security: Difficult Passages has been helpful to the Bible student in understanding that the doctrine of a born-again Spirit-indwelt believer’s Eternal Security in Christ Jesus is an absolute. Please remember that if any professing Christian falls away from their profession and denies Messiah Yeshua as their Lord and Savior, they were never saved to begin with; they were False Converts.

In Eternal Security: Difficult Passages 3, we will be examining just one passage from the book of Hebrews. Some have taught that the book of Hebrews, 1 and 2 Peter, and James present a totally different gospel than that which was taught by the Apostle Paul, who was the Apostle to the Gentiles. There is absolutely no warrant for such a conflicting and contrasting view that would only render the Scriptures and the precious gospel of Christ contradictory.

While Hebrews (along with 1 and 2 Peter and James, which are all addressed to the children of Israel) has a distinctly Jewish flavor for its intended readers, with many allusions to past Israelite history – in which the context is extremely important in ascertaining the writer’s objectives – in truth, there is a cohesiveness with the epistles of Paul that cannot be overlooked, utterly lacking any conflicting or contradictory doctrines with the teachings of the Apostle to the Gentiles.

If the reader has any other difficult passages in the books of the Brit Chadashah concerning the Biblical doctrine of Eternal Security that they would like to share with me, please email me. If we get enough passages that would warrant a fourth installment in this series, we will include them in a new study, Eternal Security: Difficult Passages 4.

Epilogue

Truly born-again Spirit-indwelt believers in Jesus Christ are kept eternally secure in the hands of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit – the One True God – by the same grace that saved us in the first place!

“That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.

“In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.” – Ephesians 1:10-14

Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” – 1 Peter 1:2-5

May we all keep Answering the Call of The Great Commission, and giving an answer to every man and woman who so desperately needs Jesus and asks us, “Why Am I Here and What Is It All About?

Love, grace, mercy, and shalom in Messiah Yeshua, and Maranatha!

***

➢    Email: mab10666@yahoo.com – I would love to hear from you!

➢    If you have not given your life to Jesus Christ and are seeking answers about God, Jesus Christ, the gospel, and salvation, please email me at mab10666@yahoo.com for information.

➢    I am still taking questions for the Questions from the Body of Christ series. If you or someone you know has a question pertaining to the Word of God – theology, difficult passages, eschatology, etc. – I would really like to hear from you.

➢    To view my entire catalogue of articles, please visit my Home Page on FaithWriters.com.

➢    To be added to our Prophetic Update, please email to mab10666@yahoo.com and ask to be added to our mailing list.