Feds Move to Takeover Police :: by Daymond Duck

On December 18, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13684 establishing the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing.

On Mar. 6, 2015, he spoke about the rioting in Ferguson, MO and announced his plan to impose federal standards on state and local police forces.

He called for an increase in the kind and amount of data that is being collected and stored on citizens and to be able to retrieve it instantaneously from government data bases.
Critics pointed out that the German Gestapo and the Russian KGB were government controlled police forces that persecuted and killed millions of opponents.
They expressed opposition to his plan to control the local police, know more about U.S. citizens and to be better able to track everyone.

On Aug. 4, 2016, it was reported that Pres. Obama has found a way to take over local police departments and his Justice Dept. has already taken over the police in several large cities including Newark, NJ; Miami, FL; Los Angeles, Cal; Ferguson, Mo; Chicago, Ill; and more.

It goes like this: an incident is used by the Justice Dept. Civil Rights Division to file a federal lawsuit against a city, county or state alleging that the police have violated someone’s civil rights following a demonstration or jailing.

The city, county or state is allowed to plead no contest under the condition that it signs a consent order to let the Justice Dept. regulate the police.

A UN Human Rights Council representative has already praised this and called for even greater federal control of the various police agencies.

A Google search found that the Justice Dept. filed a lawsuit against Newark, NJ and it was settled by Newark agreeing to federal monitoring; the Justice Dept. filed a lawsuit against Miami, FL and it was settled with Miami signing a court-enforceable mutual agreement.
The Justice Dept. filed a lawsuit against Ferguson, MO and it was settled with Ferguson signing a court-enforceable mutual agreement; and Justice Dept. is investigating the use of force by the Chicago, IL Police Dept.
In a previous article titled “Black Lives Matter Exposed,” I wrote about a leader in that group named DeRay McKesson. Some of the groups funding originated with George Soros.
Mr. McKesson has had several meetings with Pres. Obama at the White House and the Black Lives Matter group has been officially endorsed by the Democratic National Committee.
Videos show Mr. McKesson’s involvement in many of the demonstrations that have taken place this summer. At Ferguson, MO there was rioting, looting and property destruction.

At Baton Rouge, LA, Mr. McKesson and many others were arrested while demonstrating on July 9, 2016. One police officer lost several teeth when he was struck in the mouth by a projectile. Police said they confiscated eight firearms.

Guess what? Mr. McKesson has filed a federal lawsuit against the Louisiana police. He claims that they acted in a “militarized and aggressive manner.”

I am not a betting man, but if I was, I would bet that his lawsuit will be settled by the signing of a court-enforceable mutual agreement with the U.S. Justice Dept. monitoring the police.

I will go one step further. As I started to send this article in I heard a TV reporter say that a man with a gun was shot in a chase in Milwaukee, WI.

I Googled it and read that a few hours later, a crowd gathered for what looked like a Black Lives Matter protest. It got out of control. Several vehicles were vandalized and set on fire. Several buildings were burned

A policeman was hit in the head by a brick. Shots were fired when firemen arrived to put out the fire.

It is too early to know all of the details, but in less than 24 hours people are already calling for the police department and the criminal justice system to be reformed.

I cannot predict the future and, once more, I am not a betting man, but if I was, I would bet that a lawsuit will be filed and I would bet that it will be settled by the signing of a court-enforceable mutual agreement with the U.S. Justice Dept. monitoring the police.

The public is being told that the objective of these court-enforceable agreements is to promote trust between Law enforcement and the people. But this comes from a man in the White House that is now famous for not telling the truth.

I believe the real objective is federal control of the city, county and state police. And when that objective is realized it will be followed by the Justice Dept. ordering the city, county and state police forces that they control to confiscate everyone’s guns.

Be aware that the upcoming election (if there is one) pits a candidate that opposes gun seizure against a candidate that supports it.

Prophecy Plus Ministries
Daymond & Rachel Duck