Pharmer Bill: #1 Owner of American Farmland :: By Geri Ungurean

And CRISPR plays a big part in Pharming!

Isn’t this ‘phun’? written in 2018

Pharming: the process of genetically modifying plants and animals so that they produce substances which may be used as pharmaceuticals. An outgrowth of genetic engineering, the technique has been branded ‘pharming.’

-Dubbed “pharming” by its opponents, this is the latest step in technology which allows medicines to be grown in plants.

-The genetic engineering of livestock for human medical applications is known as pharming.

-Then there’s what’s known as pharming – the relatively new practice of using genetically altered livestock to produce proteins used in pharmaceuticals.

-For example, there has been talk about southern agriculture specializing in growing GM plants that are used by the pharmaceutical industry (so-called pharming).

-Instead of using expensive pharmaceutical factories, advocates envisage fields of GM crops being harvested to reap new medicines cheaply, a process known as pharming.

-Earlier this year the U.S. Department of Agriculture updated its guidelines for industrial pharming, but many scientists believe these are grossly inadequate.

-Recent mergers, as well as research into “bio – pharming,” have erased many boundaries between the pharmaceutical and agricultural industries.

-This is vital to prevent New Zealand being exploited as a ‘wild west’ playground for inappropriate and unethical developments like ‘pharming.’

-Rissler and Ellstrand argue that pharming should be strictly limited to nonfood crops – to, say, tobacco or castor beans.

-Pharming” is a new field of research involving herds and flocks of animals that are transformed into chemical factories to produce pharmaceutical products.

[Recently I wrote an article in which “Vaccines in your Salad” was brought to light. I had an unusual number of people emailing me that I had gone off the rails. Perhaps after reading this article, those naysayers will be whistling a different tune. For the past week, I have been wondering about and researching reasons why Bill Gates has become the number one Farmland owner in the whole U.S. One thing was certain to me: it must have to do with VACCINES. Most of us know that VACCINES are near and dear to the heart (does he have one?) of Pharmer Bill:]

Plants in the CRISPR

From gene-edited human embryos to disease-free pigs for donor organs, applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology are filling the headlines. But the impact of this gene-editing technique isn’t limited to biomedical research: Plant biologists are also using CRISPR to study molecular mechanisms underlying plant function, fight disease, and enhance plant productivity.

“The CRISPR craze has pretty much swept through plant biology,” says Dan Voytas of the University of Minnesota. “I would say most groups doing plant gene editing are using CRISPR or similar reagents.” As a result, CRISPR/Cas9 could prove pivotal in addressing the challenge of feeding the world’s growing population, which is expected to approach 10 billion by 2050.

New plant breeding

Transgenic plants (also known as genetically modified organisms or GMOs) have been around for decades. But the insertion of foreign genes and DNA to produce desirable traits has prompted controversy as well as rejection of these plants by some consumers. In recent years, biologists have been developing more tailored methods for altering genomes that complement traditional plant breeding strategies and dovetail with new genetic tools. Until the advent of CRISPR within the past 5 years, one of the more promising gene-editing technologies was TAL effector nucleases (TALENs), which were developed from building blocks that occur naturally in plants.

However, CRISPR/Cas9 has largely overtaken other gene-editing techniques. Researchers tell similar stories: A few years ago, they started working on projects using both TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 side-by-side but quickly settled on CRISPR. While both techniques offer precise editing, TALENs are large, complex proteins that must be newly synthesized for each mutation, says Becky Bart of the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center in St. Louis. But using CRISPR/Cas9, a researcher needs only to develop new guide RNAs, she says, and “very quickly you can test a bunch of constructs right in the lab.” As a result, CRISPR is both cheaper and faster, says Bing Yang of Iowa State University. And combining CRISPR with a traditional plant breeding program offers the most potential for making precise changes quickly.

That doesn’t mean TALENs and other methods are completely out of the picture, though. With the continuing uncertainty surrounding the patents and licensing of CRISPR technology, many companies are still centering their work around technologies such as TALENS and meganucleases, where the intellectual property rights are clear, says Voytas, who was one of the early developers of TALENs and is the Chief Science Officer of Calyxt—a Minnesota-based plant gene-editing company focusing on that technology (see “Legal and regulatory hurdles” sidebar).

Mining mutations

Scientists have long mined natural plant mutants that show up in fields or used random mutagenesis as a tool for understanding gene function in crops. “Hopefully, you hit a gene; hopefully, you get a change in the phenotype of interest, the trait of interest, and then you try to pin down which gene is broken,” says Zach Lippman of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York. His laboratory focuses on understanding the flowering process, particularly in tomatoes and the related Solanaceae (nightshade) family, so that they can ultimately manipulate the process to improve agriculture.

[Brothers and sisters in Christ, this is a rather long article, and for those who wish to read it in its entirety, they can click HERE. But for the purpose of posting this piece, I will go right to the last few paragraphs. There you will see how the author plopped in the word we were all waiting for:]

Limitless possibilities

Despite the technical hurdles, CRISPR/Cas9 is changing plant biology as fast as it is revolutionizing other fields. Just a few years ago, a research article might have highlighted the ability to mutate plant genes using CRISPR, but now the title touts a better understanding of plant architecture, with CRISPR embedded in the Materials and Methods section. “I’m not saying that we don’t have a lot of work yet to do on technology development,” Voytas says, but he adds that it’s satisfying to see this shift. “It’s become the tool and not the story.”

With the investments made by researchers and industry, Kamoun sees CRISPR-based gene-editing technology as maturing relatively rapidly in plants. “I think the challenge now becomes about finding the traits,” he says. For a long time, plant biologists didn’t have the tools to apply the knowledge that they’d gained about interesting plants’ genes and then deliver those results to farmers. But now they have the technology, he says. “We need more research to actually understand what all of the genes are doing in plants and how we can tweak them and improve them.”

After years of mostly reading genomes, researchers are editing and moving toward rewriting those genomes in increasingly sophisticated ways, Voytas says. Synthetic biology, though rudimentary right now, could help modify plant genes to produce rare metabolites or even PHARMACEUTICALS of interest. Such technologies could allow researchers to modify nutrient content to lower gluten levels in bread or optimize the fatty acid content in cooking oil. “The possibilities are limitless, but the editing allows us to start to harness and control those metabolic pathways,” he concludes. (emphasis added) source

So now, when you read about the “plant-based proteins” which Gates has in store for us to consume – PLEASE remember this article!!



Articles at

The War Upon Us All :: By Geri Ungurean



More than 60 years ago, John F. Kennedy issued a warning about the “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” that was using “covert means for expanding its sphere of influence.” He also warned us about the “very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon” by the perpetrators of this conspiracy to advance their agenda.

In 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic offered the would-be conspirators an ideal opportunity. The worldwide emergency enabled them to launch a decisive gambit to sidestep the legal strictures of democratic rule and attempt to create a global authoritarian police state. The experience was hugely distressing to the people in almost every nation, but it was also very revealing about the nature, methods, and objectives of the conspiracy. While the public response to the pandemic was unscientific and contrary to the established norms of public health policy, it was also nearly identical in most nations, suggesting that the incoherence was not an error but an integral part of the planned policy response.

This policy, including the media-driven narrative and the draconian censorship of all dissent, was clearly coordinated at a supra-national level. To achieve such policy coordination across the world could not have been achieved without a powerful force of coercion. But what force could explain such uniform compliance with the same destructive policy mistakes by nations large and small, rich and poor, powerful and weak all around the world? Who could force nations of the whole world to obey its dictate, and how?

We had the first glimpse of this force in action in June 2020 when Belarus’ president Aleksandr Lukashenko publicly snubbed a $940 million line of credit from the International Monetary Fund. He rejected it because the IMF conditioned the loan on Belarus’ imposing a strict Covid-19 lockdown policy and a curfew. Significantly, Lukashenko mentioned on several occasions that the IMF negotiators wanted Belarus to do “like in Italy.” Conditioning loans with terms that would severely impair the borrower’s ability to repay makes no economic sense, so the conditionality clearly had different objectives. Deep in debt and with collapsed tax revenues, most governments around the world needed loans, making them prey to the dictates of money power.

By April 2020, 85 nations have formally requested financial assistance from the IMF. To secure the needed funds, they presumably accepted the terms, agreeing to follow the World Health Organization (WHO) dictate. As a result, they extended the lockdowns beyond all reason, destroying countless small and medium-sized businesses, shut down schools, created Stasi-like contact-tracing programs, conspired to obscure effective treatments, and instituted heavy-handed censorship of public discourse. They also agreed to promote vaccinations as the only way for us to return to normal life and cooperated on instituting Covid passes that would condition their own citizens’ freedom of movement on their compliance – first with the vaccine requirements, but ultimately with any demand that the global authorities might deem conducive to their agenda.

Why accepting IMF terms was high treason

We only learned about IMF’s terms because the president of Belarus disclosed them publicly. Other governments quietly accepted the money and agreed to the terms. But in doing so and complying with the WHO policy dictate, government officials effectively took orders from an external power to the detriment of their own nations, economies, and populations.

A public health emergency must not be accepted as a defense. In all nations, taxpayers fund their governments, which keep many domain experts on their payrolls precisely to ensure that government policies are constructive, productive, and lead to improvements in the life of their societies. Uncritically implementing policy measures that were clearly and egregiously contrary to the best interests of their own populations at the behest of external powers from which they accepted funding should, in fact, be regarded as high treason.

Given their positions of privilege as well as responsibility, they should not be able to invoke ignorance or inexperience in their own defense. The very nature of their office obliges them to source the best available expertise and apply discernment in serving their own constituents. In abdicating on these obligations while complying with the dictates of an external power, they have effectively committed high treason and must be held accountable accordingly.

All who were complicit must be held accountable

Public officials could not have done much damage without active and extensive complicity from the mass media and academic institutions. As we know, many of these organizations took funding from some of the same stakeholders who wield disproportionate influence at the World Health Organization, big pharma corporations, and the global financial organizations.

Eyes on the ultimate culprits

What the world experienced over the last 30 months was the greatest crime against humanity ever perpetrated. But while many public officials, media moguls, and corrupt academicians had complicity in this crime, the agenda was formulated and planned by those who had the means and the motive to set the wheels in motion. This “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” clearly originated from the international banking cartel together with their agencies like the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, World Bank, the Global Systemically Important Banks (GSIBs), and others who control the issue of money and credit with which they can bribe and co-opt almost any structure in society.

A famous member of that cartel boasted, “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws!” At money power’s receiving end, French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte understood that relationship all too well: “When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation.”

The bankers have long coveted the control of the world, its resources, and its populations. As Carroll Quigley warned us, “The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world.… The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups.” Quigley wrote those words in his 1965 book Tragedy and Hope, suggesting that this conspiracy was discernible many decades ago. Indeed, over a century ago, Lord Acton prophesized that “the issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the bankers.”

This fight is now upon us. The “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” that JFK warned us about has unleashed an undeclared war on humanity. It will prove to be the ultimate struggle between our emancipation or our final enslavement. We do not have the choice to decline this struggle, for in yielding, we would deprive our children and their children of liberty, condemning them to a lifetime of servitude. But in destroying the conspiracy and bringing the ruthless conspirators to justice, we can free all of humanity from this servitude and reclaim the liberty and prosperity that is our birthright under God. We are the ones we have been waiting for, and we are many. Join us in this struggle, for we will prevail! SOURCE

Brothers and sisters in Christ, I must add here that ‘winning’ the war against these evil entities would be best for our world, but we are in the end of the end days, and Satan and his minions are waging war against humanity like never before.

Remember that God is in control! And remember the warnings Jesus gave us about these days.

And most importantly, remember Who wins!!