Stupidocrisy: The Hate Just Keeps on Coming :: By Bill Wilson

Political disagreement has always been part of the American experience. What has become increasingly common, however, among Democratic officeholders and leaders is the replacement of disagreement with personal destruction.

The latest examples came in rapid succession. Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean compared supporters of President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement to followers of Adolf Hitler. Former Obama advisor David Axelrod declared that Trump’s statements about election integrity were “a sin on our country.” Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner described Trump as “certainly the worst person to have ever run for office.”

The language grows harsher, the accusations become more extreme, and the volume continues to increase. The pattern is familiar: opponents are no longer viewed as fellow Americans with differing views, but as existential threats who must be defeated at all costs. This style of politics creates a dangerous cycle. Americans hear words like “Hitler,” “threat to democracy,” “fascist,” “criminal,” and “enemy” thrown around so casually that genuine debate gets buried beneath emotional outrage.

Citizens who simply want secure borders, economic stability, safer communities, affordable energy, or fiscal responsibility become caricatures in a political narrative. The result is a political culture that rewards outrage and punishes reason. The temperature rises while solutions become harder to find.

Perhaps the most telling development came from comments surrounding the possibility of another impeachment effort. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently indicated that Democrats have not ruled out future impeachment proceedings against President Trump if Democrats win control of the House.

For many Americans, that statement sounds familiar. The country endured years of investigations, hearings, special counsels, impeachment proceedings, and endless political warfare instead of focusing on inflation, debt, national security, education, or economic growth. The prospect that a future House majority could immediately restart impeachment discussions suggests that some leaders remain committed to continuing the conflict rather than resolving it. The impeachment mill appears ready to spin again.

The deeper issue is spiritual as much as political. Hatred is a poor foundation for governing. Scripture teaches that anger and contempt ultimately consume those who embrace them.

Americans can disagree passionately on policy, elections, taxes, immigration, foreign affairs, and social issues while still recognizing the dignity of fellow citizens. Political victory achieved through constant vilification comes at a steep cost to the nation’s character. The republic thrives when ideas compete. It weakens when opponents are treated as enemies.

The hate just keeps on coming because it generates headlines, donations, clicks, and votes. Yet followers of Christ are called to a higher standard.

As Proverbs 15:1 says, “A soft answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.”

Fueling the hate machine is, say it with me, Stupidocrisy.

Sources

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/08/howard-deans-likens-maga-to-hitler-loyalist-for-trump/

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/08/axelrod-trump-declaring-elections-rigged-is-a-sin-on-our-country/

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/11/graham-platner-trump-is-certainly-the-worst-person-to-have-ever-run-for-office/

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/14/hakeem-jeffries-on-trump-impeachment-calls-dems-havent-ruled-anything-out/

 

How Can This Happen in America? :: By Bill Wilson

How can this happen in America? Maine District Court Judge Jennifer Nofsinger issued a ruling that effectively prevented a young girl from attending church, reading the Bible with her mother, participating in Christian activities, celebrating certain Christian observances, and maintaining relationships with church friends.

The case arose from a custody dispute between divorced parents, but the implications reach far beyond one family.

The First Amendment to the Constitution plainly states that government shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Yet here we are in 2026, watching a court order place significant restrictions on a child’s exposure to Christianity while the case works its way through the appeals process.

Judge Nofsinger accepted testimony that participation in the church attended by the girl’s mother could cause psychological harm to the child. She ruled that the girl’s father had authority over the child’s religious upbringing and sharply limited the mother’s ability to involve her daughter in church life. The mother has appealed, arguing that the order violates both parental rights and religious freedom protections.

Religious liberty advocates from across the nation have rallied behind the case because they see something much larger at stake. When a court begins determining whether Bible reading, church attendance, Christian fellowship, or participation in religious activities is acceptable, it calls into question whether the court has crossed a constitutional red line. This case should concern every American, regardless of religious affiliation.

The issue is not whether someone agrees with the teachings of a particular church. The issue is whether government officials possess the authority to restrict religious practice based upon disagreement with those teachings. If a judge can decide that exposure to biblical beliefs is psychologically harmful, where does that authority end? Today, it may involve a Christian family. Tomorrow it could involve Jews, Muslims, Catholics, Protestants, or any group whose beliefs fall outside prevailing cultural norms or a judge’s biased opinion.

Religious liberty exists precisely because the founders understood that government should never serve as the arbiter of theological truth. Courts have a duty to protect constitutional rights, not redefine them according to contemporary social preferences or “expert” opinions.

The good news is that Judge Nofsinger’s ruling is now under review by Maine’s highest court. The appeals process provides an opportunity to reaffirm a principle that has guided this nation since its founding: religious freedom is not a privilege granted by government. It is a God-given right protected by the Constitution.

A nation that can restrict Bible reading, church attendance, and Christian fellowship through judicial decree risks weakening the very freedoms that distinguish America from places where government controls matters of faith.

The First Amendment deserves faithful application. Our constitutional freedoms remain strong when they are defended, and especially when they are tested.

Acts 5:29 says, “Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said: We ought to obey God rather than men.” Indeed.

Sources

Breitbart News
https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2026/06/06/exclusive-girl-kept-from-church-bible-and-christian-friends-by-portland-judge-awaits-appeals-court-ruling/

Decision Magazine (Billy Graham Evangelistic Association)
https://billygraham.org/decision-magazine/articles/mother-barred-from-taking-daughter-to-church-awaits-maine-high-court-ruling/

CBN News
https://cbn.com/news/us/judges-ruling-blocks-maine-mom-taking-her-daughter-christmas-church-services

The Maine Wire
https://www.themainewire.com/2025/11/mom-barred-from-taking-daughter-to-church-or-letting-her-read-the-bible-appeals-to-maines-highest-court/

Portland Press Herald
https://www.pressherald.com/2026/01/13/maine-courts-are-weighing-when-parental-rights-outrank-religious-freedoms/