Another Brick in the Wall :: by Donna Wasson

This is the New York Times headline for today, 3/19/15: “Obama may agree to UN resolution on ’67 borders after Netanyahu campaign rhetoric.” Uh, excuse me, but just who died and made this moron King of the World?! Who is this man who dares defy the chosen people of the Living God?

During Netanyahu’s campaign, he stated that he would not allow a Palestinian state on his watch. The people voted overwhelmingly to re-elect him. Today, he stated in an interview with Fox News “I didn’t retract any of the things I said in my speech six years ago, calling for a solution in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes a Jewish state.”

He also said he thinks the conditions for a two-state solution, “today are not achievable” since the Palestinian leaders refuse to accept Israel as a Jewish state and their intentions are to allow terrorists to occupy any territory Israel withdraws from. He also told MSNBC that his ultimate goal is “a sustainable, peaceful two-state solution” if circumstances change.

White House Press Secretary, Josh Earnest, said that Obama is concentrating on what Netanyahu said before the election, which shows the Israeli leader is backing away from being willing to negotiate. “It does raise questions about his commitment to that solution” Earnest stated today.

He went on to warn that the United States’ position of protecting Israel from United Nations interference was based on coming to an agreement on a Palestinian state. He said that foundation has now been “eroded” and the Obama administration is reevaluating its position, and is considering supporting the United Nations plan to pressure Israel into a peace deal with the Palestinians.

Netanyahu told Fox News that he hopes this isn’t Obama’s intentions. “I hope that’s not true, and I think that President Obama has said time and time again, as I’ve said, that the only path to a peace agreement is an agreement, a negotiated agreement. You can’t impose it. You can’t force the people of Israel, who’ve just elected me by a wide margin, to bring them peace and security, to secure the State of Israel, to accept terms that would endanger the very survival of the State of Israel. I don’t think that’s the direction of American policy. I hope it’s not.”

Despite unprecedented action taken by the Obama administration to influence Israeli elections by sending Obama’s re-election campaign manager along with his team to Israel to work with Netanyahu’s opposition, Netanyahu won a decisive victory for an amazing fourth term. I’m pretty sure I heard Obama’s pink, lacy knickers twisting from here. He is livid Bibi won because he absolutely detests him and he hates Israel. He has finally extended the basic courtesy of a congratulatory phone call to Bibi on his win. It’s about time as he’s been acting like a truculent, pouting brat.

The New York Times reports “According to several administration officials, the Obama administration is now seriously considering agreeing to the passage of a United Nations Security Council resolution ‘embodying the principles of a two-state solution that would include Israel’s 1967 borders with Palestine and mutually agreed swaps of territory.’”

Let’s look at all this from a different angle. How would France feel if Spain decided that they wanted some of France’s territory? There’s plenty of room for Spain already, but they are upset that France won just a little too much land in the Franco-Spanish War (1635-59), and they want some of it back.

They whine and cry about being thrown off ‘their’ land and go to the United Nations, calling France bullies and terrorists for “occupying” what was previously Spain’s territory. The United Nations clucks their collective tongue at France and tries to shame the country for being so aggressive and mean to the poor, poor Spanish people. They agree with Spain and start pressuring France to move their borders back to pre-1635 lines.

Then, the United States sticks their big nose into the fray, agreeing with the United Nations and the whole world starts throwing France ugly looks and calling them troublemakers. If they would ONLY give up that land to the Spanish, the whole world would be a peaceful utopia. Does anyone besides me see how completely absurd such a scenario would be?

What happened to the concept of national sovereignty?! What ever happened to everybody minding their own dang business and keeping their nose out of other countries issues? Can you image the outrage of the French people were they in Israel’s shoes? The fact that the entire world is pressuring a sovereign country to give up what little land they have to placate their mortal enemies, is completely insane!

Who do the leaders in the United Nations think they are, anyway? NO other nation on this earth would put up with such atrocious and flagrant interference in their business! Why should Israel? The fact that this is happening to Israel, the Apple of God’s eye, being foretold in scripture, is even more proof that the Bible is 100% accurate.

If I am this appalled and angry on Israel’s behalf, just think of the seething rage the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is feeling right now! WOE to America and this wicked administration. “And the Lord thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies, and on them that hate thee, which persecuted thee.” Deuteronomy 30:7 (KJV)