The Hebrews were to be “a light for the Gentiles” (Isaiah 49:6; Deuteronomy 4:6).

They failed abysmally, and there was a heavy consequence. They were dispersed across the globe … punished and despised, and that has occurred to this day.

However, a worldwide evangelization by the Jews will yet occur, but not without supernatural help. One hundred forty-four thousand men who are redeemed from the earth (Revelation 14:3)—selected and sealed (protected) by God (Revelation 7:4)—will go about this mandate before the end of the first half of the Tribulation.

But possibly, even more so than the Jews, the Church (the greatest recipient of grace to date) has failed. How so? Among many shortcomings, it has neglected to teach and preserve the Rapture Doctrine—the great, blessed hope of the Church: “the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13; cf. Romans 8:24).

This has brought much tragedy these past two millennia. And, the worst fallout of this mortal oversight is yet to come. The coming devastation falling upon many people in the Tribulation would be entirely indescribable due to its scale were it not detailed in the Scriptures. People beyond number will be slaughtered … which otherwise would not need to have happened, as we will explain.

As applied to the Hebrews, the Church too has been tasked as a light to the world (Matthew 5:14). Yes, Christ is in charge of building His Church (Matthew 16:18). Yet when He returns, He will find little faith on Earth (Luke 18:8). The great shock is that so few saints will be in the Church … this already being the case today.

But, is it balanced to say that the Church’s shortcomings are greater than those of the Jews? The reader may judge this question for themselves at the conclusion of this series. However, surely the list of Scriptural derelictions is long—among many, Replacement Theology; “Best Life Here and Now” Theology; Prosperity Gospel; and, as mentioned, the robbing of the “great hope.” All of these distortions have little to do with the Rapture and are spiritually deadly. The fact of the matter is that both the Hebrews and the Church failed many times, requiring necessary interventions (and dispensations) by God. The Rapture counts as one of these for the Church, as well as the First Resurrection for the Tribulational Christians.

Consider this statement carefully: The saints of the Tribulation are a number “that no one could count” (Revelation 7:9). Here the Bible is referring to earthdwellers in the first half of the Tribulation period, who come to acknowledge Christ and refuse to bow to the Beast. They become Christians … literally, so to speak, just under the wire. They are distinct and not part of the Church, as it has already been raptured away at this point. These Tribulational Christians will ALL be killed (as we will yet prove).

To confirm, the text from Revelation 7:9 clearly establishes that it is actually those who are saved (and slaughtered) in the first half of the Tribulation period that are beyond number.

By comparison, those that earlier ascend in the Rapture are not without number. They are a smaller group … namely, stragglers … as there is little faith on Earth at this time. This account parallels Christ’s words to the Philadelphian church. It is weak (small in population). However, Christ says that “since you have kept my command to endure patiently, I will also keep you from the hour of trial that is going to come on the whole world to test the inhabitants of the earth” (Revelation 3:10). This verse anticipates the Rapture.

Just how many candidates qualifying for the Rapture are there today? It would be impossible to estimate. Only Jesus Christ can know the answer. But, if we are allowed to hazard an opinion, it would be to say that whatever their number, it will be surprisingly low.

In any case, the failure to teach the imminent expectation of the Rapture will lead to the greatest human and demonic atrocities and suffering of all time.

The consequences will be horrific, to put it flatly. How so? All who become followers of Christ after the Rapture, who refuse to bow to the Beast and ignore the lure of economic security, will be pursued, pilloried, persecuted, and made to perish. All who turn to Christ will die and be martyred! This will happen to many people … most likely countless more than would have been the case had the Church taught the Rapture with the Gospel.

Would it be too extreme to draw this conclusion? All those who did not bow to the Beast—these, the souls of those who will be “slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained” (Revelation 6:9)—may carry a grudge against the Church. They could have been raptured had they known ahead of time … had they been evangelized earlier and taught the expectation of an imminent Rapture.

But, are we correct that all Christians will die in the Tribulation period (specifically, in the first half)? There is opposition and questioning of this position. Can we know with certainty that all Tribulational Saints will be martyred? We make the case that this indeed happens … we believe, beyond doubt.

In doing so, we discover that this proof provides an indisputable, doctrinal anchor for placing the occurrence of the Rapture event in a pre-Tribulation time frame.

Why Are the Saints Overcome?

Allow us to first address one other question before launching into the proofs of total Martyrdom. We read about a situation in the Bible where the “holy ones” are given over to be defeated by the Antichrist, the latter also known as the “little horn.” This statement is found in the 7^th chapter of Daniel. He tells us: “As I watched, this horn [the ‘little horn’] was waging war against the ‘holy ones’ and defeating them” (verse 21). Again, not to miss this, it says “defeating them.” We may wonder why this is allowed to happen to the “holy ones,” as it would be considered unjust. It would seem unconscionable that God will allow “holy ones” to be overcome by the devil during that time. Here again, the proof of this action is indisputable.

Any lingering doubt of this occurrence is quickly dispelled, as this defeat of the “holy ones” is described at least five more times in the Bible.

A few verses later (Daniel 7:25), it states that the Antichrist “will speak against the Most High and oppress his ‘holy ones’ […] The ‘holy ones’ will be delivered into his [the Antichrist’s] hands for a time, times and half a time.” Here we learn that this ordeal faced by the “holy ones” will last three and a half years in the Tribulation Period.

But that’s not all. There are yet additional and similar prophecies in the book of Daniel, which state that the “holy ones” would be overcome. A later vision of Daniel that was interpreted by an angel informs us that “[…] he [the Antichrist] will cause astounding devastation and will succeed in whatever he does. He will destroy those who are mighty, the ‘holy ones’” (Daniel 8:24).

Lastly, in Daniel 12:7 it says again: “It will be for a time, times and half a time. When the power of the ‘holy ones’ has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.”

We see here that even though the “holy ones” are said to be “mighty,” they will be destroyed.

Crucially, the above-mentioned statements from Daniel in the Old Testament all align with prophecies written in the Book of Revelation … this in the New Testament.

There, we read that “people worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, ‘Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?’” (Rev 13:4). “It [the beast] was given power to wage war against God’s ‘holy ones’ and to conquer them […]” (verse 7).

These are the exact same words that Daniel wrote centuries earlier. These “holy ones” mentioned in both the Old and New Testaments are the same identity. Daniel and John the Revelator are in perfect alignment. The Beast’s supremacy cannot be in doubt.

Also, the two passages agree on the time period over which the defeat of the “holy ones” will take place—42 months; a “time, times and half a time”; three and a half years. This same period is mentioned both by Daniel and Apostle John. Given these confirming references from both Testaments, there can be no doubt. For a period of 3 1/2 years (in our interpretation, this must be in the first half of the Tribulation period), the “holy ones” are going to fall prey to the Antichrist.

They will not only be defeated, but also the Bible says they will be destroyed (Daniel 8:24). A plain interpretation would therefore suggest that ALL are destroyed, a perspective which aligns perfectly with proofs from the New Testament.

Just who are the “holy ones”?

We will identify them in the next part of this series.

***

Wilfred J. Hahn is a global economist/strategist. Formerly a top-ranked global analyst, research director for a major Wall Street investment bank, and head of Canada’s largest global investment operation, his writings focus on the endtime roles of money, economics and globalization. He has been quoted around the world and his writings reproduced in numerous other publications and languages. His 2002 book The Endtime Money Snare: How to live free accurately anticipated and prepared its readers for the Global Financial Crisis. A following book, Global Financial Apocalypse Prophesied: Preserving true riches in an age of deception and trouble, looks further into the prophetic future.

Do you have questions or other perspectives? You can contact Wilfred at: staff@eternalvalue.com. Please note that for reasons of volume and investment securities regulation, he cannot give financial advice.

 

 

If all prophecy teachers were opposed to “sharpening” their interpretations, today, we would still be teaching that Nero, the Roman emperor of the first century, was the Antichrist. For example, in the earliest existing commentary on Revelation, Victorinus, Bishop of Pettau, writing in the late 3rd century, mentions Nero as having been considered the Antichrist (who, to remind, is shown as the 8th Ruler King in Revelation 17).1 At times, many other incorrect theories abounded (and still do): for example, that the Herodian dynasty was the manifestation of the 7 heads on the scarlet beast shown in Revelation 17.

We can study how the passage of time sometimes influenced the interpretations of the early church fathers. For example, a brief review of the perspectives on the last-day “ten kings” will be illustrative and informative. Irenaeus, writing later in the 2nd century, sees the 10 kings existing closer to his times. He theorizes that the development of the 10 kings results from a division of the then existing Roman Empire. He says:

[…] concerning the ten kings who shall then arise, among whom the empire which now rules [the earth] shall be partitioned. […] It must be, therefore, that the kingdom, the city, and the house be divided into ten, and for this reason, He has already foreshadowed the partition and division [which shall take place]. Daniel also says, particularly, that the end of the fourth kingdom consists in the toes of the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar. […] The ten toes, therefore, are these ten kings, among whom the kingdom shall be partitioned […].2

While we are encouraged to see that Irenaeus linked the 10 kings (10K) with the 10 toes of Daniel 2, we clearly do observe a bias working in the theories of Irenaeus. Rather than seeing that the final formation of the 10 kings will be driven by a motive of “aggregating” power sufficient to dominate the world, allowing this beast (and later, the Antichrist himself) to continue “[…] crush[ing] and devour[ing] its victims and trampl[ing] underfoot whatever was left” (Daniel 7:7), his perspective is more influenced by the vista of his day. At that time, the Roman Empire was still powerful and a single entity. Therefore, to his mind, a division was required to bring about the 10-king empire.

How could he have accurately predicted in his day that the Roman Empire was yet to collapse, only to revive again much, much later, and the 10 kings only appearing after that time? It can be deduced today that the 6th head on the beasts of Revelation 12, 13, and 17 is the Roman head. Today, we are more naturally inclined to see the 10-king arrangement as a collection of power … a coming together … as opposed to a division. After all, the 10 kings “have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast” (Revelation 17:13, KJV).

An interpretation similar to that of Iranaeus carried through to later Fathers. Cyril of Jerusalem, probably writing in the middle of the 4th century, also believed that the 10 kings were to occur in his day, seeing the kings coming out of the Roman Empire. A few decades later, Jerome (living between 340 and 420 AD) saw things the same way, preserving the dogma established in earlier times. He says:

We should therefore concur with the traditional interpretation of all the commentators of the Christian Church, that at the end of the world, when the Roman Empire is to be destroyed, there shall be ten kings who will partition the Roman world amongst themselves.3

What is interesting is that the Roman Empire of the late 4th and early 5th century was already a shell of its former grandeur. Rome was sacked by the Ostrogoths in 410 AD. The empire’s final demise is considered by most historians to be around 470 AD. Yet, even though the Roman Empire was clearly disintegrating, this idea of “partitioning” into 10 kings still held, though there was not much left to be divided up. At no time during the first five centuries AD was there ever any group of 10 nations or peoples that existed contemporaneously, nor even remotely representing an orderly partitioning of Rome into 10 following kingdoms.

Today, we see the same sort of bias at work. Previous theories of prophetic fulfillment can continue to be favored, even when new developments have interceded that clearly prove them incorrect. Even in matters where no definitive answer may be possible, at least the recognition that alternate scenarios exist is an interpretational improvement.

Modern Prophecy Dogmas Still Exist

As stated at the outset, olden-time dogmas need “sharpening” from time to time. Are there incorrect dogmas today in some circles with respect to prophetic interpretations? Most certainly there are. Are there many, and how influential are these? This writer is not knowledgeable enough to offer a credible opinion. However, we can point to at least a few miscreant views and will mention just three that are related to the interpretations of 7 heads and 10 horns mentioned in Bible prophecy.

But before we continue, just why should we even care that dogmas may be false? Though many aspects of prophetic interpretation do not rank as doctrine, error is still likely to cause harm, even if only subtly. On the other hand, misinterpretations leading to Millennialism or Amillennialism can have a significant impact upon faith, possibly leading to other church corruptions. We will conclude with these results, as there is one impact that is sure to please the enemy.

Just what are some examples of dulled dogmas? A few decades ago, many prophecy experts were absolutely sure that the endtime fulfillment of 10 kings was in place when Greece joined the European Common Market (ECM) in 1981 as the 10th member. Some had jumped to this conclusion even earlier—in 1967—when Norway, the UK, Denmark, and Ireland were accepted for application to membership. The planned addition of the three would have brought the ECM to 10. As it turned out, Norway did not accede in 1973 due to a lost national referendum on membership. It would take another 10 years before the 10th member, Greece, was to accede. Alas, only five years later, both Portugal and Spain joined, pushing ECM membership to 12. Today, the ECM (renamed the European Union in 1993) has transitioned to a 27-member Union.

Interestingly, even much earlier in the last century, it was thought that the Council of Ten Nations, who were the victors of World War I, may possibly be the manifestation of the final 10 kings.

Could the final 10 kings eventually come out of the European Union (EU)? Definitely, yes. It is a very feasible theory in this writer’s view. However, we still cannot prove that it will happen without doubt from Scripture. There are other credible theories. As such, we cannot pronounce that the European Union we see today is the sure forerunner of all 10 kings. If this cannot be proven conclusively from Scripture, or if other possibilities exist, then it must be treated as a theory and not dogma. Otherwise, we risk marring the veracity and interpretation of Scripture.

The prophecy community—which had promoted the “dogma” of a European 10-king coalition, with specific statements subject to many twists and permutations—lost some of its credibility. Neither did it reflect favorably upon the Bible.

Other Vulnerable Dogmas Today

There are surely other examples of incorrect interpretations that qualify as dogma in some circles. Some teaching distortions stem from overlooking the fact that the Antichrist appears only after the 10 kings are on the scene, and not before. Daniel 7:24 expressly proves this chronology, saying that “the ten horns […] are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first” (KJV). How much ink and paper have been wasted over the centuries on idle speculations of the identity of the Antichrist? The 10 kings arrive first. If the 10 kings are not first clearly evident, then the Antichrist cannot yet have arrived in power.

Why would this clarification even matter? One reason is that it would quell the rampant speculation—often hyped—about a peace treaty with Israel, among other prophesied Middle Eastern developments. How many times do we read that the very next peace negotiation with Israel will unveil the Antichrist’s identity, perhaps even today? Well, possibly, yes. But not until after the 10 kings are on the scene. In the meantime, countless unnecessary speculations and sensationalizations are proven to be merely wind. Of course, this does not mean we should be unconcerned with Middle East developments, or should stop praying for the peace of Jerusalem (Psalm 122:6), but to do so grounded in Scripture.

Finally, we will address one more prophecy interpretation that is popularly received as dogma. Seemingly, every time a major world leader or prominent figure has suffered a near-death experience (perhaps surviving an assassination, as in the case of Pope John Paul II in 1981), the speculation mills point to their candidacy for the Antichrist. In some circles, it is widely believed that it is the Antichrist (in human form) who suffers the wound to the head mentioned in Revelation 13:3, 12, & 14. No, the Antichrist is never shown as one of the heads on the beast(s) but rather as a horn that grows out of the 7th head on the beasts shown in Revelation 12, 13, and 17. Revelation 17 expressly says he is of the 7 kings (which are shown as 7 heads) and becomes the 8th king.

Therefore, the actual physical Antichrist is not even presented in the picture of the scarlet beast of Revelation 17. Moreover, the Antichrist is shown as an 11th horn in Daniel chapter 7 … coming up from among the 10 kings. Therefore, none of the “horn” kings can or will experience “a wound unto death.”

Thoughts to Ponder

There are more contestable prophecy interpretations that could be mentioned. However, our objective was simply to show that it is not unusual that there should be differences in interpretations … certainly not in matters of future prophecy fulfillment. Many of these do not qualify as reasons to break fellowship. What does matter is the reputational damage inflicted upon inerrant Bible prophecy due to unfounded, speculative statements … fears sometimes being hyped for profit.

There came the time that the boy “who cried wolf” was no longer believed. When the wolf finally arrived, no one cared to listen to the boy’s warnings. Why? The boy had lost his credibility and reputation as a sound witness.

For this and other reasons, it compels one to remain vigilant and always open to new interpretations that will be more faithful to Scripture. Moreover, we should always strive to separate opinion and speculation from factual representations of what the Bible actually does and does not say. This writer has certainly made such errors in the past and hopes not to make too many more in the future.

God has chosen prophecy as one of the unique means of proving His existence. Therefore, a cunning enemy would not overlook the strategic importance of discrediting the Bible by way of sensationalist and fraudulent prophecy teachers, who are prone to jump to incorrect and speculative pronouncements.

The Bible states that the whole world is overtaken by darkness during the last days—particularly so during the Tribulation period. A number of prophecies alert us to this characteristic of the end-time period. “See, darkness covers the earth and thick darkness is over the peoples” (Isaiah 60:2). “Will not the day of the LORD be darkness, not light—pitch-dark, without a ray of brightness?” (Amos 5:20). Darkness and evil are a mark of these times.

Given such conditions, it would not be surprising if the course of geopolitical events is even being deliberately planned to deceive and to discredit Bible prophecy. After all, the father of lies and deception is in control of the world at this time. Bible prophecy works to his disadvantage, as it serves to us as a “light shining in a dark place” (2 Peter 1:19).

Today, as far as the “10 kings” fulfillment theories are concerned, even though Europe has unified itself in a remarkable fashion over the past 70-plus years, the final, prophesized 10-nation coalition is still not obvious …certainly not identifiable in exact detail. We may feel urged to declare answers to the many open questions of end-time prophecy, but who can know the exact course of events, even over the next few months?

What can we conclude? Without a doubt, some great geopolitical shifts and world-reverberating tumult still lie ahead. Yes, we do have the gift of prophecy (1 Corinthians 13:2) and know that the very “testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy” (Revelation 19:10). Yet, “We live by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7), believing that all prophecy will be fulfilled literally.

***

Wilfred J. Hahn is a global economist/strategist. Formerly a top-ranked global analyst, research director for a major Wall Street investment bank, and head of Canada’s largest global investment operation, his writings focus on the endtime roles of money, economics and globalization. He has been quoted around the world and his writings reproduced in numerous other publications and languages. His 2002 book The Endtime Money Snare: How to live free accurately anticipated and prepared its readers for the Global Financial Crisis. A following book, Global Financial Apocalypse Prophesied: Preserving true riches in an age of deception and trouble, looks further into the prophetic future.

Do you have questions or other perspectives? You can contact Wilfred at: staff@eternalvalue.com. Please note that for reasons of volume and investment securities regulation, he cannot give financial advice.

1 Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325, Vol. XVIII. Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson. Published by T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1870.

2 Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies, Book V, Chapter 26 (AD 180/199).

3 Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, Chapter 7, Verse 8. (http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/jerome_daniel_02_text.htm)