Tariff Transparency Trap: Amazon & Temu’s Misleading Math :: By Bill Wilson

Big Tech and fast-fashion retailers are playing a new game with old rules — and the rest of us are being misled in the process.

Amazon announced it will begin displaying tariffs as a line item in customer checkout totals. Meanwhile, Chinese e-commerce giant Temu is adding “import charges” to its pricing, following the reintroduction of Trump-era tariffs. On the surface, it sounds like these companies are embracing transparency. In reality, they’re shifting blame and confusing shoppers about who’s really paying the price. Temu is inflating the retail value of the import when the tariffs are based on the wholesale value. And then Amazon backtracked by denying its announcement after a call from Trump.

Here’s the truth: US tariffs on Chinese goods are based on the wholesale value — the price paid by importers, not the final sticker price seen by consumers. A 25% tariff on a $100 item imported from China means the importer owes $25. That cost may then be passed on, but it’s up to the seller how much of that burden hits the customer.

The key point here is that tariffs are calculated based on the wholesale cost of the goods at the point of importation, not the retail price. For example, if an importer buys a product for $10, and the tariff rate is 25%, the tariff would be calculated on the $10 wholesale cost — not the $20 price you might see at a retail store. This is outlined by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which uses the customs value — typically the wholesale price — to determine the appropriate tariff.

When a company like Amazon shows a $12 “tariff fee” during checkout for a $50 item, it may not be charging you based on what Amazon paid — they’re presenting a calculated markup to make the fee feel more painful. No surprise, says the Trump Administration, as Amazon is partnered with a Chinese propaganda arm. The intention seems to be political: highlight Trump’s tariffs and make consumers feel they’re being gouged by government policy rather than by corporate pricing.

After benefiting from the “de minimis” loophole, which let Chinese goods under $800 to ship duty-free, Temu now faces higher costs. But instead of adjusting product pricing or absorbing some impact, they’ve slapped on new import fees, blaming tariffs while masking the real reason behind their historically low prices: tax dodging and exploitative shipping routes.

By inflating or misrepresenting tariff costs, companies create political pressure and consumer confusion. But make no mistake: tariffs are real, and they’re applied to wholesale costs — not what you see at checkout. True transparency would mean disclosing the actual import cost and how the tariff was calculated. Instead, consumers are treated to a pricing theater that hides more than it reveals.

In this economic shell game, Amazon and Temu aren’t informing the public — they’re manipulating perception.

As Proverbs 11:1 reminds us: “Dishonest scales are an abomination to the Lord, But a just weight is His delight.”

Whether in ancient markets or modern e-commerce, the call for honest measurement and truthful pricing remains the same. Transparency without accuracy isn’t justice — it’s deception.

Sources:

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/04/29/report-amazon-to-display-line-item-tariff-cost-in-customers-checkout-prices/

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/28/temu-adds-import-charges-after-trump-tariffs.html

https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3308292/us-shoppers-pay-trump-tariffs-temu-shein-also-raises-prices?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.theverge.com/news/657807/trump-amazon-tariff-hostile-pricing?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Posted in The Daily Jot

 

Stupidocrisy: Policy Death By Lawfare :: By Bill Wilson

The Democrats have successfully used an illegal alien to divide America and implement a strategy to make it impossible to deport millions of illegal aliens.

Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran national, was deported in March due to an administrative error. In the aftermath, the Trump administration is standing firm on claims that Garcia was not only in America illegally but also was affiliated with the terrorist-designated MS-13 gang, human trafficking, and domestic violence. Democrats counter that Garcia, a model noncitizen, lacked due process. Trump says a court date for every illegal the Democrats allowed free entry to the US would make it impossible to do what he was elected to do.

Trump’s prediction is bearing out. The courts have barred the Trump Administration from deporting any more such illegals until due process has been demonstrated. These were the same judges who have been working together with the Democratic Party to thwart the border security and illegal immigration policies of the Trump administration.

There also has been a media outcry, stirring up every leftist and communist organization to support Garcia in the name of justice. The facts of the case have become muddied by the shrillness of the media and others. To discern, consider the base reason that Garcia was deported. He was in the country illegally. This isn’t a matter of personal hardship or misunderstood intentions.

Garcia was in this country without authorization, and that is the root of the issue that cannot be overlooked. But it is being overlooked because of the media smokescreen that has been generated. It would appear that the Democrats have some sort of polling data that suggests that Americans don’t want illegals deported without a certain due process, and they are willing to politically die on that hill.

As far back as in Exodus 12:49, the LORD established “One law shall be for the native-born and for the stranger who dwells among you.” And it is similar in America. Those in the country illegally have broken the law upon entry. But they are entitled to due process under the law. According to the law, if an illegal alien or noncitizen has been convicted of a crime (which means there was a day in court), that person can be deported.

There is also a legal system in place called “expedited removal” that allows for aliens to be removed if they are apprehended within 100 air miles of the border and have been in the US for 14 days to two years. Even in these cases, there is due process. The Garcia case has led the courts, including the Supreme Court, to halt all deportations of this type until due process can be verified.

George W Bush deported 2 million illegals with zero court halted deportations; Obama deported 3 million with 1 court halted case; Biden deported 500,000 with 2 court halted cases; Trump has had 4 sweeping court-halted cases on nearly 38,000 deportations this term, more than Clinton, George W Bush, Obama, and Biden combined on approximately 6.2 million deportations. The lawfare here is, say it with me…Stupidocrisy.

Sources:

https://legal-info.lawyers.com/immigration/deportation/conviction-may-mean-deportation-or-removal-from-us.html

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/24/2025-01720/designating-aliens-for-expedited-removal

https://infographicsite.com/infographic/deportations-under-us-presidents-statistics/

Posted in The Daily Jot