Vaccine Gaslighting Part III–Corporate Ethics :: By Bill Wilson

In 1961, future president Ronald Reagan said, “One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project; most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.” Reagan reasoned that once a government or a tyrannical power has your medical information, it can dictate your life or diminish you.

This is one of the possible agendas of the COVID vaccine, which by CDC’s own statistics, there is less than a 1% chance of contracting the COVID virus and less than .02% chance of dying from it if contracted.

Let’s roll back time to World War II and Adolf Hitler’s final solution.

Do you know who helped him identify, classify and kill Jews so efficiently? IBM. Yes. It’s True. Edwin Black, historian and investigative author, in the book IBM and the Holocaust, documents that it was IBM’s Dutch and German subsidiaries working with the Nazi Party who developed the punch-card system that systematized the Holocaust.

Black writes, “Scientists and engineers debased their higher calling to devise the instruments and rationales of destruction. And statisticians used their little known but powerful discipline to identify the victims, project and rationalize the benefits of their destruction, organize their persecution, and even audit the efficiency of genocide.”

IBM does not deny this, and it is very well documented.

Back to the present.

On March 4, IBM and Moderna announced they were developing end-to-end vaccine tracing and management solutions to enable governments and healthcare providers to quickly share data. In addition, they created the Digital Health Pass so that personal health information can be used to verify individuals’ health records, credentials, and test results for workers, customers and travelers.

This is a more sophisticated computerized version of IBM’s punch-card system of Hitler’s era. This system is already deployed in New York, and of all places, Israel, which should know better. Microsoft, as part of a consortium of high tech and healthcare companies, is working on merging these systems with payment platforms, geolocation tracking, and personal credit history.

Everyone should make an informed personal decision whether to get the vaccine. Likewise, we should collectively consider the ramifications of Reagan’s warning. The government and/or large corporations are tracking those who comply and those who don’t. What they will do with that list is not yet entirely revealed. Already, however, they are making decisions on who can go to events, indoor dining, and who has safe passage in emergency evacuations.

Is it too much of a leap to consider next steps—like shutting down religious groups because of what society calls outdated Biblical beliefs; Or deciding which kids can go to school; Or who gets medical care; Or who gets food; Or who gets to work, and where; Or who lives?

As Christ said in Matthew 24:4, “Take heed that no man deceive you.”

Posted in The Daily Jot

No US Vaccine Passport—Don’t Be So Sure :: By Bill Wilson

While White House press secretary Jen Psaki made worldwide headlines on April 6 with her emphatic statement that the “government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a [vaccine] credential,” Americans need to pump the brakes on their relief.

The entirety of Psaki’s statement raises the very real possibility that the government knows it cannot require a vaccine passport, but that corporations are more likely to bypass Constitutional privacy rights by requiring proof of vaccination for various services. Just as this Administration relies on corporate media to censure dissent through propaganda and social media platform control, so too is the intent on vaccine passports.

Let’s look exactly at the question asked in last Tuesday’s press briefing and the response.

Question: Is there any thought being given to a federally organized vaccine passport of some kind? Does the President see that maybe as some kind of tool that could be used, or would he lean more on the side of people who have raised objections over privacy and so on?

Psaki responded, “The government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a credential. There will be no federal vaccinations database and no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential.”

Psaki then pivoted to the private sector, “As these tools are being considered by the private and nonprofit sectors, our interest is very simple from the federal government, which is Americans’ privacy and rights should be protected so that these systems are not used against people unfairly. There is a movement, as you know, in the private sector to identify ways that they can return to events where there are large swaths of people safely in soccer stadiums or theaters. And that’s where the idea originated, and we expect that’s where it will be concluded. We will be providing some guidance, which will look like an FAQ, a frequently asked question; I hate acronyms, but that provides important answers to questions that Americans have, in particular around concerns about privacy, security, or discrimination, soon.”

Referring to vaccine passports as “tools” that the private and nonprofit sectors can use means these passports can and may well be required by the private sector with the government’s blessing.

Are your rights to free speech being violated when a social media platform kicks you off for something you said? You may think so, but technically it’s not the government repressing your speech; it’s a non-government entity with which you signed a contract to use the platform. The same issue will apply with proof of vaccination. If you want to use the service or attend the event, you will comply.

This is eerily like a “grooming” for the end times, an example of how Revelation 13:17 can happen very quickly:

“that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” Be discerning. Be aware.

Posted in The Daily Jot