Comparing the safety analysis Pfizer prepared for full FDA approval in April 2021 with Anthony Fauci’s newly released communications now shows senior health officials knew there were significant health risks of the COVID mRNA shot.

In March 2021, The Daily Jot obtained a confidential copy of Pfizer’s report from an anonymous source and held it for about a month while verifying its authenticity before reporting it. By February 2021, Pfizer already had received 42,086 case reports containing 158,893 adverse events involving cardiovascular, neurological and blood conditions, anaphylaxis, pregnancy losses and lack of efficacy. Pfizer nevertheless repeatedly concluded its reviews raised no new safety concerns.

Fauci’s own communications show that he knew significant safety concerns were being discussed and that officials were privately debating the uncertainties. Pfizer’s report already listed myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, and a sweeping range of cardiovascular, neurological, immune, and inflammatory conditions as adverse events of special interest, possible side effects serious enough to warrant further investigation.

FDA acknowledged that more serious adverse reactions requiring longer follow-up might emerge. Pregnancy was one example where there was insufficient data. Fauci acknowledged a theoretical miscarriage association. Yet the Biden Administration, government, Pfizer, and the corporate news media continued the “safe and effective” narrative despite considerable evidence to the contrary.

Thousands died alone in hospitals and nursing homes, while those facilities received substantial reimbursements. Military personnel, health-care workers, government employees, students, and private-sector workers faced losing, and in some cases lost, careers and livelihoods for refusing the shot, and business failures in the wake.

Long-term safety comparisons were weakened after placebo recipients were offered vaccination. Then the bureaucracy took over. FDA at one point proposed a timetable stretching roughly 75 years to release the records. A federal judge rejected that approach and ordered the agency to release 55,000 pages every 30 days.

Government demanded unprecedented public trust and extraordinary compliance while putting bureaucratic roadblocks between Americans and the information they needed to find the truth.

Considering what those in charge knew and when they knew it, a disturbing picture emerges. Fauci, the FDA, Democratic officeholders demanding shutdowns and vaccine compliance, Pfizer, and the news media have retreated behind plausible deniability as consequences emerged. Meanwhile, healthy people I know who took the shot have since suffered strokes, cancer, heart problems, blood clots, and other serious conditions they believe are connected to it. And they got COVID anyway. They are left with questions and little accountability from those who demanded their trust and compliance.

That may be COVID’s harshest lesson: Be very careful whom you trust, especially when questioning authority is discouraged.

2 Timothy 3:13 warns, “But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.”

Sources:

Pfizer, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021”
https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2022-N-0904-17940/attachment_1.pdf

U.S. Senate, Senators Johnson and Paul, “Additional Texts from Dr. Fauci’s Government iPhone,” August 16, 2026
https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2026/08/16/senators-johnson-paul-release-additional-texts-from-dr-faucis-government-iphone/

FDA, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” December 10, 2020
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download

FDA, “Leading the Way Forward: Biden Administration Actions to Increase COVID-19 Vaccinations,” March 17, 2021
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/congressional-testimony/leading-way-forward-biden-administration-actions-increase-covid-19-vaccinations-03172021

FDA, Clinical Review Memorandum, Comirnaty, August 23, 2021
https://www.fda.gov/media/152256/download

Fauci, Lane and Redfield, “Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted,” New England Journal of Medicine, February 28, 2020
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. FDA, January 6, 2022 order
https://foiaproject.org/case_detail/?case_id=34599&style=foia&title=on

The Department of Health and Human Services has released a disturbing report titled: Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of “Gender Medicine.” The report says pediatric gender clinics and hospitals may have used misleading or potentially fraudulent diagnostic and procedural codes to obtain insurance coverage for puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries on minors.

HHS points to diagnoses such as unspecified endocrine disorders and precocious puberty that could make treatments more likely to qualify for reimbursement. HHS is calling for investigation as medicine, money and ideology appear to have formed a dangerous alliance.

The report argues these recurring medical needs created potentially lucrative, long-term revenue streams. Financial incentives can overwhelm the duty to protect vulnerable patients.

Follow the money and the picture becomes even more troubling. HHS says pediatric gender programs grew from a handful of specialized clinics into programs at more than 225 hospitals and health systems nationwide by the early 2020s. The report describes what it calls a “captive patient” dynamic, in which children beginning puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones can require years of medications, laboratory testing, specialist visits, monitoring, and potentially surgeries. HHS cites estimates of nearly $120 million in submitted charges involving minors since 2019, including thousands of surgical procedures and hormone or blocker treatments.

Government policy helped build the environment in which this system flourished. HHS says the Biden Administration actively promoted access to gender-transition procedures for minors through federal agencies, civil-rights enforcement, funding policies, and legal actions. The Justice Department challenged state restrictions, while federal policy increasingly treated so-called “gender-affirming care” as protected healthcare.

These positions reflected Democratic Party policy and strengthened institutions defending pediatric transition practices. States and parents seeking restrictions often found themselves fighting both the medical establishment and federal government. The result turned disputed medicine into institutional policy backed by government and taxpayer dollars. But the deepest scandal is measured in damaged lives.

HHS cites young people and parents describing hormones, surgeries, regret, and lasting physical consequences. These children encountered a system predisposed toward transition and supported by Democratic Party political ideology, institutional pressure, and financial incentives.

Children cannot comprehend every lifelong consequence of sterilization, altered development, or removal of healthy body parts. Adults have a moral responsibility to protect children from those who would exploit their vulnerability.

Isaiah 10:1 warns, “Woe to those who decree unrighteous decrees, who write misfortune, which they have prescribed.”

HHS has given investigators a roadmap to determine whether aggressive advocacy crossed into medical fraud. Those exploiting children for ideology or profit deserve investigation, accountability, and justice.

Sources:

HHS, Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of “Gender Medicine”
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs-wolves-in-white-coats.pdf

The Epoch Times, HHS Report on Alleged Pediatric Gender Treatment Fraud: 5 Key Takeaways
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/hhs-report-on-alleged-pediatric-gender-treatment-fraud-5-key-takeaways-6075444