Mar 12, 2017

Jesus Was A…Refugee?

We’ve been discussing Replacement Theology of late, and it comes in many forms. It also almost always comes with a denial by a person who actually holds to Replacement Theology.

As Andy Stanley likes to say often, and I’m paraphrasing, PR is all-important in church life today. One wants to project a positive image, and things like the dislike of Jews is…problematic.

It’s one thing for a stodgy Presbyterian (I’m not picking on Presbyterians; Pentecostals and Baptists can be stodgy, too) to pitch a tent in the Replacement Theology camp. It’s another thing for Progressives to do it. They are connecting with a different audience: Millennials.

This week, writer Jonathan Merritt “liked” a tweet by Evangelical/Leftist/Progressive/Hippie/Radical/Activist Shane Claiborne, in which Claiborne alleges that Jesus Christ was a refugee. Claiborne is a founder of The Simple Way, a community of activists who feed the hungry, renovate houses, and the like. Merritt is a senior columnist for Religion News Service, contributing writer for The Atlantic, and contributing editor for The Week.

Those are high-profile platforms for a boy from Atlanta (now living in New York City), whose father happens to be former Southern Baptist Convention President James Merritt. Merritt the Younger is part of SBC royalty, and that proves useful for a fellow who is leftwing but wants evangelicals to think he’s one of them. He’s a leading change-agent within the American Church.

He and his friend Shane Claiborne teach Millennials that Jesus was a refugee!

In Claiborne’s tweet, which I consider to be fiendish, he posts a cartoon of what appears to be Mary and Joseph in a life raft, approaching a beach patrolled by an Israeli soldier. Just behind the soldier is a barbed wire fence. The sun in the sky appears to be shaped like a Star of David. The IDF soldier stops the little family, stating, “Sorry. There’s no room.”

As in, the inn. You know, the one the parents of Jesus tried to find for his birth. Just as the biblical family was turned away in Bethlehem, so too are oppressed Palestinians turned away from entering “their territory” via checkpoints (which the IDF sets up to prevent terrorism).

As with most progressives, Claiborne’s winsome personality belies a nasty undercurrent of contempt for conservatives and those who identify as Bible-believing Christians. Merritt projects a similar persona, but he also has little patience with his ideological opponents. To like such an anti-Semitic tweet is very telling.

The “Jesus was a refugee” canard is classic PLO propaganda and anti-Semitism. It’s the kind of stuff the late serial killer, Yasser Arafat, used to peddle to willing dupes and useful idiots he cultivated within the Christian mainline in America. These days, that same hateful ideology is pumped into the bloodstream of America’s youth.

Typically, pro Palestinian activists like Claiborne portray Israelis as Nazi-like oppressors of the downtrodden Palestinians. They lift Jewish history from the pages of the Bible and give it a modern, twisted slant.

For example, it is true that Jesus lived for a time in Egypt with his parents. However, they were all Jews living in Judea, then under Roman occupation. Today, Israel-haters flip this and make the Israelis the occupiers and the Palestinians the oppressed “Jews” of today.

It’s all a toxic stew of political and religious claptrap, designed to turn more Millennials against the Jewish state.

It works.

Given the nation’s biblical illiteracy, coupled with Millennials’ general gullibility—we were all once young and naïve—progressives like Claiborne are free to roam around presenting false history and get away with it. In this case of historical revisionism, the victim is the democratic state of Israel, a champion of women’s and minority rights, among other things.

You’d think Claiborne and Merritt would write about that. But then, one can’t raise the ire of one’s Muslim buddies and overlords.

There’s much more to this issue, but just know for now that young activists like Merritt and Claiborne are working overtime to overturn evangelical support for Israel. It’s one of their pet projects.

In early February, Merritt tweeted, “This may be the first ‘good’ surprise from this administration. (If true.)”

He then links to an article by Michael Wilner, the Jerusalem Post’s Washington bureau chief: “Exclusive: Donald Trump supports a two-state solution and is warning #Israel to cease settlement announcements.”

First, the contempt Merritt, Claiborne (and perhaps, Wilner?) & Friends have for the Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu is palpable. They thirst for a Palestinian state, and whether they recognize or realize the Palestinians intend to use it as a terror launching pad against Israel for a final assault is not known. Perhaps they are naïve. It would be preferable to the alternative.

Second, no one knows what Trump is telling the Israelis behind closed doors and certainly no one knows if he is “warning” them (cue the horror movie music). In fact, in a joint press conference recently with Netanyahu, Trump skillfully said that he supports whatever kind of state Netanyahu wants.

Doesn’t really sound like warning and doom and brimstone to me.

But progressives like Claiborne and Merritt need their government to put the screws to Israel. Their ideology demands it.

It’s only slightly ironic that Merritt grew up in the SBC, which used to tend toward support for Israel. The denomination’s leadership now is making troubling noise that this won’t always be the case.

Claiborne graduated from Eastern University and was mentored by the equally winsome Tony Campolo, who uses his engaging personality to mask his own contempt for conservatives. He is a long-time Palestinian activist. Claiborne also studied at Wheaton, home to anti-Israel professor Gary Burge, and he served an internship at Willow Creek Community Church, founded by Palestinian activists Bill and Lynne Hybels.

It’s all a neat, well-funded network of radical progressive change agents who loathe Donald Trump, Netanyahu, and us knuckle-draggers who hold on to our guns and Bibles.

I encourage you especially to read Jonathan Merritt’s blogs online. Notice the phrasing, the manipulation of issues to promote a progressive agenda. The smiling face masks a menacing view of conservatives and, in this case, Israel.

Jesus wasn’t a refugee. He was, is, and will always be a Jew from Judea, the Son of the Living God, who loves His people.

Not everyone loves them.

Jim1fletcher@yahoo.com

Mar 6, 2017

Do You Like Jews?

I received a fair amount of feedback from the recent “Israel Watch” that spotlighted Calvinists who are dismissive of Israel and Bible prophecy.

Most writers can be more precise, and I certainly should have stated that not all Calvinists have this view of Israel. However, this week I want to pose a different question that has real relevance for this conversation.

Do you like Jews?

When I say “you,” of course, I might be addressing you, but this is also a sample query for that Calvinist in your life that doesn’t talk about Israel or the Jews much. Maybe he is lukewarm on the teaching of Bible prophecy.

One reader wrote to me this week and stated that a well-known pastor has some Calvinist leanings but he is also “pro Israel.”

Along with my question above, let me ask this: what does it mean to be pro Israel?

Is it affirming that Israel plays a major role in prophecy? Is it loving the Balfour Declaration, or May 14, 1948?

What I’m getting at is this: my personal definition of being “pro Israel” also must include a love for the Jews. As Jews, especially those living currently in the state of Israel.

I know there are various camps. Some are annoyed that others don’t join organizations that evangelize Jews. Others acknowledge Jewish history, but Israel today? Not so much.

In fact, I’ve been somewhat alarmed by the number of national evangelical leaders who frankly seem to take a dim view of modern Israel. I suspect that privately, they dislike Israel quite a bit. There is a definite disconnect with some leaders regarding ancient and modern Israel. Some go so far (as a leader in the United Methodist Church told me 20 years ago) as to claim the Jews living in Israel today have no connection to the Israelites of the Bible. This in my view is an outcome of anti-Semitism. It is absurd to claim that Joshua and David are not related to Benjamin Netanyahu or the young Golani troops that guard Israel today.

In Deuteronomy 4:37,38, we read an important point:

“Because he loved your ancestors and chose their descendants after them, he brought you out of Egypt by his Presence and his great strength, to drive out before you nations greater and stronger than you and to bring you into their land to give it to you for your inheritance, as it is today.”

God loved, loves, and will love the Jews. Period. So should we do likewise, with no strings attached.

Attaching strings has brought great misery to the Jewish people. An example is their view of who the Messiah is. Christian raging at the Jews for rejecting Jesus has led to murder.

Another reader wrote this week to tell me a story I’ve heard many, many times. It seems that when he was growing up, he heard very negative things about the Jews.

But he never met one.

Anti-Jewish stereotypes are not confined to Nazi Germany or Tehran. Some of them exist in the modern American Evangelical community.

I am pro Israel first because I love the Jews. That’s it. Everything else flows from that: a love for prophecy, a love for modern Israel, etc. I am not pro Israel to “get a blessing” or because they are “an important ally in the Middle East.”

My issue with Calvinists is that with some of them, their personal dislike of Jews colors their view of eschatology. Yet…too many of them I’ve had conversations with dismiss the idea that they are anti-Israel or anti-Jew.

It should seem obvious that we all bring biases to our worldviews. I am biased that the Jewish people are a shining light in our world today. Some people are biased that the Jews are part of a global cabal that controls wars and financial institutions.

The really important question is this: whose bias is true?

I am not dogmatic about everything. I don’t make “loving Jews” a litmus test for fellowship. One does not need to love the study of Bible prophecy.

But if you harbor ill feelings for Jews—if your heart is dark toward them—we part company. I won’t listen to your theology that promotes Replacement Theology at the same time you deny your Replacement Theology.

Notice again those verses from Deuteronomy. Here God is addressing the Jewish people, not the Church or the “True Israel.” He is making specific statements and promises to the physical line of descendants that began with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and remember too, Isaac was the “child of the promise.”

To denigrate the modern Jewish people, because you need the Church to usurp them, is grotesque in my view.

At the end of the day, when entering into a discussion/argument/debate with someone who does not hold the Jewish people and Israel in high esteem, scratch the surface and look at what’s underneath.

Do they like Jews? Or do they dislike Jews?

Jim1fletcher@yahoo.com