Come on down for the new game in the nation’s capital—the Impeachment Game–hosted by Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA), produced by Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and sponsored by the Democratic Party.

The goal of the game is to remove the president from office using the most outrageous false claim.

Contestants are summoned by the Democratic leadership to appear in secret tribunals.

The host gathers information to leak to the media and spins the Wheel of Deception, which lands on the act the sponsor actually did for which the president will be accused.

All television networks will carry the Impeachment Game live every day, all day, until the public demands removal of the President, or the ratings crash.

Just to spice things up, the producer of the show rewrote the rules to mimic the Constitution’s impeachment process. It is real enough to make the American public think it is the same, but there are some subtle changes.

Pelosi modeled the game off of old communist and socialist dictator coups where secret tribunals were established to accuse and convict people of false acts that could be considered high crimes and misdemeanors.

The game has a social twist to it, where the audience must discern what is real. The audience is polled daily to decide which false accusation is gaining the most momentum to remove the president.

The game also provides for Defenders of the president.

• The Defenders must navigate the rules which are controlled by the producer and are written as the game continues to prevent exposing what is discussed in the secret tribunals, of which no Defender is allowed to attend.
• Defenders of the president are not allowed to call witnesses to expose the deeds the sponsors committed, but are used to accuse the president.
• Defenders also must navigate public opinion after being labeled continuously as bigots, homophobes, Islamophobes, misogynists, xenophobes, racists, having toxic manhood, benefactors of white privilege, capitalists, Christians, or other slurs the sponsor believes to be derogatory.

Contestants are summoned to testify before the secret tribunal, knowing that everything they say will be twisted when it is leaked to the news media.

Contestants choosing not to testify will be allowed to select consequences such as going to jail, being fined large sums of money, or simply having their reputations ruined.

Another group in the game is Complicit Participants.

• Complicit Participants are those who watch the Impeachment Game, but do nothing about it. The sponsor believes this group of people will ultimately determine whether the game is successful at removing the president.

Hollywood is promoting the Impeachment Game as a blockbuster television hit, sure to demonstrate a social phenomena depicting a new normal for America.

The game slogan is from Matthew 24:4: “Take heed that no man deceives you.”

https://dailyjot.com/

In June 2018, British Dr. David Mackereth was fired as a medical assessor for Great Britain’s Department for Work and Pensions for refusing to renounce his belief that gender is determined at birth. Now a British employment tribunal has ruled that Mackereth’s conscientious objection to transgenderism is “incompatible with human dignity and conflict[s] with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals.”

In Britain, according to this decision, belief in the Bible’s tenets of man and woman combined with a lack of belief in transgenderism are now grounds for discipline, including loss of employment. The decision will be appealed, notwithstanding; this is a dangerous precedent for mankind.

According to news reports, Mackereth, a Reformed Baptist, father of four, who registered as a doctor in 1989 and spent most of his career working in Accident & Emergency wards, said: “I’m not attacking the transgender movement. But I’m defending my right to freedom of speech, and freedom of belief… But, if upsetting someone can lead to doctors being sacked, then, as a society, we have to examine where we are going.”

When Mackereth’s instructor stated that reports must only refer to the patient by the sex that person identified themselves as, a discussion took place among the medics about the “fluid” nature of gender. Mackereth explains: “I believe that gender is defined by biology and genetics. And that, as a Christian, the Bible teaches us that God made humans male or female.”

The government tribunal’s decision stated that while it does “accept that Christianity is a protected characteristic, they do not accept that is so where Dr Mackereth goes further in seeking to define the beliefs he relays at [ET1/5] as a protected characteristic. The respondents argue that at the heart of those beliefs is intolerance towards transgender people, and that a refusal to respect the dignity of transgender people and their preferred form of address is incompatible with human dignity and conflicts with the fundamental rights of others.”

Mackereth had refused to address transgenders by the pronoun of the sex they had chosen because of his Biblical beliefs and scientific teachings.

The British government tribunal, however, said that irrespective of Mackereth’s beliefs, the government policy was to address transgenders in the manner they request. Mackereth refused, and was fired. The court upheld the firing. The overriding issue, however, is not about getting fired for refusing to honor policy. The tribunal recognized that Mackereth had protective rights as a Christian, but ruled that Judeo-Christian belief is against human dignity.

This is the genesis of persecution. It is also where this entire gender movement is headed—a conflict between religion and “protected” classes of people. And you see who is favored.

There will come a time when Christians will have an Acts 5:29 moment, “Then Peter and the Apostles answered and said, ‘We ought to obey God rather than men.’”

https://dailyjot.com