Call me cynical, but I can’t help to think an element of the impeachment charade is about creating political ads. Think about all the 30- and 60-second television commercials that the Democratic Party is armed with no matter what happens. Accusation after accusation against the background of sinister images of their bigoted, racist, homophobic, Islamophobic targets. I say “targets” because the Democratic Party, with its collective mind set on a socialist coup of the United States government, is aiming right now at President Donald Trump. In reality, the target is entirety of its opposition—anyone who runs a campaign against their candidates, especially if they cannot be pressured to accept the leftist agenda.

Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen gave a hint recently on MSNBC Live when describing the situation with the Senate impeachment trial. On Friday, January 17, Hollen revealed a parallel strategy. He argued that anybody not for having witnesses in the Senate trial would be “fixing and rigging the trial” and “complicit in a cover-up.”

Hollen went on to say, “You know, we have John Bolton who described what went down as a drug deal. We had this GAO report that finds that the administration broke the law by withholding aid, and Mick Mulvaney and others are right in the middle of that. So, we need four Republican senators, and I think the pressure will build because if you’re not willing to call witnesses and get relevant documents at a trial, you are for fixing and rigging the trial. And they would be complicit in a cover-up.”

I can only imagine that there will be ads that call every member of the Senate up for reelection being complicit in covering up the worst crime in American history, and twisting what was said and done into a condemnation of conservative and/or Christian values.

One person, a conservative reviled by the mainstream news media and the leftists called it like it is on Friday January 17^th’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Daily for an interview with host Alex Marlow. Matt Schlapp, chair of the American Conservative Union, described Democrats’ impeachment push against President Donald Trump as a political measure to bring an end to presidential elections.

Schlapp said, “It’s all the marbles in 2020, and I think impeachment really brings that home. The Democrat agenda is radical, but also, as evidenced in DC, it’s also not as important to them as is the wholesale destruction of Trump and everyone who supports Trump. This is important for us all to know, that Donald Trump has taken it like no other politician has in an unfair way; impeachment without crimes, so many games, Russian collusion, the special counsel, all of this ridiculousness… We all have to understand that this is a tactic that they’re honing not just for Donald Trump or for his family. It’s for all of us.”

It is for all of us.

For me, this is not just about Donald Trump. It is about the freedom we enjoy as citizens of this great nation. It is about religious freedom and freedom of speech. In the name of freedom, these people seek to snuff out any speech or thought that disagrees with their dark and dangerous agenda. No matter who the president, impeachment is not to be used as a political weapon because of disagreement with the decision of the people. Everyone who lives between California and Chicago, and then New York City, is in danger of disenfranchisement, even those who support the Democratic Party. Republican leadership doesn’t even seem to understand this grave danger.

As in II Timothy 3:13, “Evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.”

This deception is far and wide. Discern carefully.

https://dailyjot.com

One of the most biased media along with CNN regarding impeaching the president (translated: coup) is Associated Press. It is amazing how this “news” organization twists words and what it considers facts into a diatribe for impeachment.

The latest is a story about an associate of President Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani, providing new information proving that Trump delivered an ultimatum to the Ukraine President if an investigation into Joe Biden wasn’t pursued. The story acts as if this is the silver bullet that will bring down the Trump presidency once and for all. It’s also the pre-Senate trial “bombshell” that the Democratic coup-makers promised would turn the impeachment trial on end. It’s a fake news dud.

AP reports: “A close associate of President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer says he delivered an ultimatum in May to the incoming president of Ukraine that no senior U.S. officials would attend his inauguration and all American aid to the war-torn country would be withheld if an investigation into Joe Biden wasn’t announced.  Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy Giuliani, made several potentially explosive claims in a televised interview Wednesday night with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow. The day after Parnas said he delivered the message, the State Department announced that Vice President Mike Pence would no longer be attending the inauguration of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.”

Buried in the story is this: “President Trump knew exactly what was going on,” said Parnas, a Soviet-born Florida businessman facing a raft of criminal charges related to campaign finance violations. “He was aware of all my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani, or the President.” If true, Parnas’ account undercuts a key Republican defense of Trump deployed during the ongoing impeachment fight — that Trump’s withholding of vital military aid to Ukraine last summer wasn’t a quid pro quo for Biden investigations because Zelenskiy didn’t know the money was being held up.”

Key is that this guy, Parnas, is a “Soviet-born Florida businessman facing a raft of criminal charges related to campaign finance violations.” And then AP couches its sensational veracity with a qualifier, “If true…” Credibility?

This is an outrageous attempt to “fake” the American people into believing just one more terrible account of an ultimatum by the president against Joe Biden. But let’s pause for a second and gather some discernment.

First, the investigation was about Biden’s son, not Joe Biden.

Second, there is nothing illegal about a president withholding aid or not sending a representative to the inauguration of a foreign dignitary.

Third, the aid was not unreasonably withheld; it was given.

Fourth, the media is quoting a “Soviet” born source with criminal charges as credible.

This story is as flimsy as the impeachment and is more of the same. As in Hebrews 5:14, be a person who seeks strong meat “who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.” In this, you will recognize those who deceive with misdirection and vain words.

https://dailyjot.com