Our Bodies: An End-Times Agenda? :: By Jennifer Laufenberg

At the end of another unique year, we saw H.R. 550 pass the House on November 30, 2021. Now, in 2022, this bill awaits the Senate. If passed, it will be funded with $440 million dollars of taxpayer money to upgrade the “immunization system data.” Formally titled The Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2021, H.R. 550 would allow both public and private local and state health agencies to share a person’s immunization records with the federal government. Eighty House Republicans gave a hearty “Yea” to a bill that can only have nefarious intentions, laying more groundwork for a vaccine passport.

Meanwhile, as the fearmongering continues to morph into a morass of information warfare and obfuscation spreads with each new variant and failed booster, I wonder, Is it possible that the global cabal will use the body as a means to enact their plans? Does our physical body play a role in the end-times agenda?

We don’t have to be carted off like the prophet Daniel to know that our bodies are important to God. Throughout 1 Corinthians, Paul is clear that the body is a temple for the Holy Spirit and that we are not our own. “What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?” (1 Corinthians 6:19). The context of the original passage applies to sexual misconduct in the Corinthian church. However, that does not negate the truth that our bodies should not be mistreated. Certainly, that was a problem Daniel had to face when he found himself in Babylon. Exiled, the bright and devout Jew, Daniel made a conscious decision “that he would not defile himself” (Daniel 1:8).

Not Our Own

In verse eight of Daniel chapter one, we have the first reference to Daniel’s refusal. The Hebrew word pathbag denotes the phrase “a portion of … meat.” All occurrences of this phrase in the book of Daniel refer to “a dainty” or a provision of meat. Clearly, this food of which the king desires Daniel and his friends to partake is meant for the upper class. Likewise, the four are also appointed to the king’s wine. Yayin is the Hebrew word here. It means fermented wine and implies intoxication.

Daniel’s refusal is not a picture of youthful rebellion nor the act of a rash personality. Daniel was in the first group of exiles, among the nobility, eunuchs, carpenters, and smiths (Jeremiah 24:1; 29:1-2) to be carried away in Babylon’s initial attack in 605 B.C. Chosen from “the king’s seed, and of the princes” (Daniel 1:3), Daniel and his friends found themselves in the midst of a king that would bring the Babylonian empire to its zenith. Certainly, Daniel and his friends were favored by God for the task set before them. Among their favorable peers, they were chosen for being without blemish, “skillful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science” (Daniel 1:4). In other words, these children of Israel were set apart for their sharp intellect and moral convictions.

Though it may not seem like it, we, too, are chosen for this time. That knowledge should impact our decisions and give light to the winter bleakness Biden has promised to those of us who resist the so-called choicest remedies for our would-be maladies. Those who hold the power today, though, will not acquiesce as King Nebuchadnezzar, for this tyranny has been planned for some time.

Bodily Impact

Troubling effects of the Covid shots are becoming increasingly apparent. First, this “vaccine” has killed more people than any other vaccine. As reported in The Unz Review, “the death toll is three times higher than the total of all vaccines in the last 35 years,” and that number reflects only US deaths.

In the first week of 2022, data from life insurance companies has shown a substantial increase in death benefit payouts. Prudential had an 87% increase in benefits paid for their third quarter of 2021 when compared to their third quarter in 2020. Likewise, claims also increased for Pacific Life and Annuity by more than 80%, and there was also an increase in death benefits paid by New York Life Insurance, 12%.

Many alternative news networks reported CEO Scott Davison of OneAmerica who said, “We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business—not just at OneAmerica.” The death rates that Davison refers to are 40% higher than the death rates pre-Covid, and, according to Davison, are highest among “working-age people 18 to 64.”

Two points are of interest here. First, the mainstream media largely ignored this story. This week the “conservative” Wall Street Journal reported on record numbers of workers quitting their jobs because our economy is apparently booming. For months now, the Journal has also run stories on companies struggling to find workers, yet the bombshell about life insurance payments drastically increasing received zero coverage. Second, most of these deaths OneAmerica has paid benefits for are NOT attributed to Covid. What then is the cause?

On December 10, 2021, doctors Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt presented at the Doctors for Covid Ethics symposium. In their summary presentation, “On Covid Vaccines: Why They Cannot Work, and Irrefutable Evidence of Their Causative Role in Deaths after Vaccination,” they detail the pathology results of fifteen deceased individuals, ranging in age from 28 to 95. All except for three had received the full vaccine dosage: two rounds of Moderna, Pfizer, or AstraZeneca, OR one of Janssen. Their examination of the major organs revealed “clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs.”

In other words, the vaccines caused the body to turn on itself and attack several of its major organs, most often the heart and lung, but also the liver, thyroid, salivary glands, and brain.

Again, what did all of these individuals have in common? You guessed it—the Covid-19 vaccine. Now, you may be thinking that the tissue samples of fifteen individuals is too small to be significant, but combine those facts with other reports on alternative news regarding injection dangers that are ignored, suppressed, or scrubbed from mainstream media, and you see a larger picture. No wonder Dr. Peter McCullough, who Dr. Malone has reported to be “deeply in debt” from having to defend his medical license, has called these injections the “most dangerous biological medicinal product rollout in human history.”

Consider also that outside of the US, Canadian physician Dr. Daniel Nagase confirmed what many have wondered—that yes, mRNA Covid injections can indeed permanently alter our DNA by a process known as reverse transcriptase, in which the mRNA changes to DNA, becoming “integrated into the nucleus of the cell … permanently chang[ing] that cell’s DNA.”

This is especially the case, Dr. Nagase said, in children, as their cells are continually changing. Beyond permanently altering a person’s genes, the spike protein the body is programmed to continually produce wreaks havoc on the body’s internal organs (hence, see above on Dr. Bhakdi’s and Dr. Burkhardt’s pathology findings), while also decreasing the body’s ability to fight disease and increasing one’s cancer risk. For women who are pregnant, the spike protein endangers the life of the baby. Yet as Dr. Nagase points out, these dangers have been known since the 1990s.

And this leads to my second part: To what extent do our bodies play a role in the End-Times agenda?

An End-Times Agenda?

From the very beginning, Satan has been after the epitome of God’s creation: mankind. “Ye shall not surely die,” Satan told Eve in Genesis 3:4, “For … ye shall be as gods” (Genesis 3:5). Satan prevailed in stealing man’s original glory, banishing Adam and Eve from a perfect garden and severing unhindered communion with their God, but he could not win the war. Thus, he tried again to corrupt mankind through DNA when demons had physical relations with women, creating the nephilim (see Genesis 6:1-4). Only one was found “perfect in his generations,” Noah, and that was all the remnant God needed.

Nevertheless, Satan continued in his plot, trying to destroy the Messiah himself. But when that, too, failed, Satan used King Herod to attack man by ordering the death of every child two and under “in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof” (Matthew 2:16-18). Undeterred, Satan persevered in his desire to destroy Christ, and thus ourselves, by tempting Jesus to throw himself from the temple. Finally, believing he had secured victory, the enemy watched as Jesus was crucified. We know the ending, so it shouldn’t surprise us that as this age draws to a close, we might consider again whether or not the physical body has any role.

Both Daniel and Jesus gave us hints. Jesus said, “But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be” (Matthew 24:37). This relates back to Genesis 6 in which clearly the DNA pool of man had been corrupted. Likewise, in Daniel 2:43, the prophet described the last kingdom to emerge as one distinguished not just by the mixture of iron and miry clay that is “partly strong, and partly broken,” but of “iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay” (Daniel 2:42-43, emphasis mine).

Clay is of the earth; we, saved and unsaved, are of the dust, clay, earth. However, this new emergent kingdom, the antichrist’s kingdom, is of iron and clay that cannot fully mix; this imperfect union is not of this earth and not of God. Thus, what this scheme of Satan spawns may be closer to what is described in the opening of Genesis 6 with the nephilim.

If it is true that this vaccine corrupts human DNA, does this fit into the End-Times agenda? I’m not making a prediction or trying to be prophetic. It’s a legitimate question I’ve been thinking about.

The spike protein is both foreign to the body and unnatural—as in artificially constructed.

  • Why is there a massive push to hide the voluminous, serious adverse reactions and deaths linked to this vaccine?
  • Why are preventative measures such as getting adequate Vitamin D, maintaining a healthy weight or losing weight if needed, eating a healthy diet to prevent and control for co-morbidities like high blood pressure and diabetes not emphasized?
  • Why is the low mortality rate or the cold-like symptoms of the latest omicron variant buried in favor of news about school delays, closures, mask mandates, and vaccine and booster mandates?
  • Why are cheap unpatented, proven-safe drugs forbidden?
  • Why is it that now, one year after pronouncing that his administration would defeat the virus, that Biden is now telling Americans that Covid is set to become a routine part of our life? Does this mean as routine as the invasive TSA screening procedures at airports?

This gets to what physician Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, former professor at the University of California Irvine and director of their Medical Ethics Program, has written about—the biosecurity surveillance regime. (Dr. Kheriaty was recently fired for being unvaccinated and for arguing that natural immunity is superior to the vaccine.) “The real division today,” Dr. Kheriaty wrote, “… is between those who will accept a technocratic biosecurity surveillance regime and those who will resist.”

Covid paves the road for the ultimate security state, one that erodes our privacy in the name of health.

When the “pandemic” first began, my husband and I were living in Colorado. Governor Jared Polis, who undeservedly has the reputation of a libertarian, tracked how well the citizens of his state abided by the stay-at-home orders by monitoring people’s cell phone movements. In the county where we resided, public health officials would visit stores to count how many people followed mask mandates.

Biosecurity can range from the benign (as detailed above) to the far more invasive, as Dr. Kheriarty explains, from QR codes on vaccine passports to retinal scans. If chips implanted under the skin can be programmed to work as a wallet, what prevents them from being used for biosecurity purposes? That is one case that the former vice president and chief science officer at Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, makes in this fascinating, twenty-minute video that is well worth your time. (It’s also available here; just scroll down a bit.)

We know the antichrist will establish the ultimate global security state. This has been in the making with nanotechnology, the application of the infinitesimal in size to fields such as engineering, physics, chemistry, and biology. Nanotechnology’s application in the emergency use m-RNA injections was a first. Prior to Covid-19, the employment of nanotechnology in delivering medicine to the body was primarily found in cancer treatments. Yet at universities, private entities, and government agencies, research was being conducted and funded not just through private grants but through government agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense into the use of nanotechnology as a delivery component in the body.

Included in this area is nanomedicine, which looks at ways to correct or cure any dysfunction at the microscopic level of the body. Beginning in 2005, the NIH created a national network of Nanomedicine Development Centers through a ten-year funding program called the Nanomedicine Initiative. The goal of this program was to do more than simply study the smallest structures of the human body or develop technologies that would repair or cure the tiniest parts of the human body. Another goal was to “re-engineer these structures.”

Relying on both nanotechnology and nanomedicine is the field of bioelectronics, the pairing of biology and electronics. What’s interesting prophetically is that Daniel 2:43 speaks of iron being mixed with miry clay in the final world government: “they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men.” Also of note is that bioelectronics extends beyond medicine to, curiously, homeland security. On November 4, 2008, a Bioelectronics Roundtable Meeting was held at the Research Triangle in North Carolina, discussing the current role and future of semiconductors in biology and medicine. (A semiconductor is material that can either insulate or conduct electricity.) With all things electrical, bioelectronics also involves circuitry and chips inside the human body.

In their report, A Framework for Bioelectronics Discovery and Innovation, the promise of bioelectronics is one with…

“sufficiently small … novel devices [that] can be envisioned to probe cells or biomolecules either in vitro or in vivo. Advances in integration and packaging mean that circuitry can be integrated with sensors, actuators, and computers. These enabling technologies will allow the creation of devices and systems that can intelligently probe biological systems from the molecule to cell to whole organism levels and thereby open up new areas of basic biological research and new market opportunities for commercialization.”

Nanotechnology, nanomedicine, and bioelectronics are far beyond the standard x-ray, the sound waves of the ultrasound, and the radio waves and magnetic fields of the MRI ubiquitous to medicine today. Instead, we often unknowingly face technologies whose utility melds medicine to other worldly security. Where the human genome was once explored for its marvel, it is now exploited for power, greed, and self-interest. It can be weaponized, as with gain-of-function research, or re-engineered to extend life at all cost or eliminate what some refuse to cherish.

We would be foolish to view all of these medical advances as feats, wonders to aid in our health and bodily constitution. As envisioned in The Roundtable Report, written over ten years ago in 2009, the leaders desired “smart” devices and “embedded transceivers” that can sense and respond to the environment as well as transmit and receive data. In their ten-year projection, they called for “tele-monitoring” (think, today’s telehealth, made common through Covid), lab-on-a-chip (this began emerging more widely in 2021, and at least one potential use was studied with funds from DARPA), and “real time, personalized medicine, via customizable chips.”

Consider the recent conviction of Dr. Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor and former chair of the university’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department. At the close of 2021, Dr. Lieber was found guilty on all six counts of making false statements about his work for China’s Wuhan University of Technology and his involvement with China’s Thousand Talents Plan, as well as filing false tax returns and not reporting a Chinese bank account. What is interesting about Dr. Lieber’s research in nanoscience is the funding sources: $15 million from the NIH and the Department of Defense (DOD).

Among the numerous patents he held, one was on graphene transistors, prized for their high speed in electronics. This particular patent was partially funded by the DOD and CIA. It’s hard to understand why the government arm of defense and intelligence was funding this kind of research. Although, if viewed in light of biosecurity, then perhaps the connection is not that illogical.

Dr. Kheriarty points out that the real enforcement of biosecurity is with the power able to declare a state of emergency, which in the US belongs to Xavier Becerra, the secretary of health and human services. Mr. Becerra recently renewed the national Public Health Emergency Declaration. This declaration originally went into effect on January 31, 2020, and has since been extended six times, making this latest the seventh time. It is set to either expire or be renewed on January 16, 2022. Under this declaration, the secretary can “strengthen biosurveillance” and “carry out other activities determined applicable and appropriate by the Secretary.”

As citizens, we might ask ourselves, what are we relinquishing in the name of biosurveillance, or maybe I should ask, increased biosurveillance?

Jesus asked, “Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?” (Matthew 6:27). The phrase “by taking thought” means to be anxious about. “Stature” means age. Worrying isn’t going to add years to our life, but it may lead down a path that will adversely affect the quantity or quality of our life.

The human body is a marvel. It was created in glory, and one day those who have saving faith in Jesus Christ will see our bodies restored to their original glory. Until that day, Satan remains intent in his quest to destroy us, and one method he has deployed throughout the scriptures is bodily attack. Jesus said that Satan comes to steal, kill, and destroy. He was given permission to attack Job’s body but not to take his life. He stole Adam and Eve’s glory. He sought to kill Jesus. What’s to say that Satan isn’t after our bodies now, to destroy them as best he can. For by doing so, he destroys humankind, we who bear God’s image, the image our adversary detests. How much more could hatred manifest itself?

When Daniel refused the king’s diet, he demonstrated a link between the physical body and the spirit. I’ve heard many Christians argue 1 Timothy 4:8, “For bodily exercise profiteth little: but godliness is profitable unto all things,” or say that their body is of little value here as they will return to dust and receive a better one, so why bother? Yet God is not mocked. The body should be cared for, as it is the temple for the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6).

The Scriptures on the body should not be shunned or limited to the Jewish dietary laws. Indeed, the World Economic Forum is fashioning a new body, called the Internet of Bodies, which will “center on the human body and health” and will connect “our physical data via devices that can be implanted, swallowed, or simply worn.” The FDA has already authorized digital pills, “tiny, ingestible sensors” that, incidentally, contain medicine too. Once swallowed, the pill, via the sensor, can transmit data to your personal device—or someone else’s.

So where, if at all, do all these fit in the End Times: Covid? The jab? Our bodies? Tiny devices compliments of nanotechnology, bioelectronics? Biosurveillance? At what cost to ourselves do we partake in these?

Paul issued a stern warning in 1 Corinthians 3:17 about the body. Daniel measured the cost and made his choice. David requested God’s strength to resist temptation: “Incline not my heart to any evil thing, to practice wicked works with men that work iniquity: and let me not eat of their dainties” (Psalm 141:4).

A new world of iron and miry clay is on the horizon, and that means our snatching away is even closer. Until that call, we can trust in God’s security for all our needs, bodily and otherwise.

Jennifer Laufenberg